Acquisition processes might stymie new defense opportunities

Arcane procurement methods slow shift to new defense priorities

Pursuing business under the Defense Department’s new spending priorities might be easier said than done for information technology contractors. Although the budget priorities change, DOD’s cumbersome acquisition processes haven’t, some sources say.

“The government doesn’t often buy what it says it wants,” said Pat Ryan, Cisco Systems Inc.’s director of business development for the global government solutions group/defense. “It buys what comes out of the other end of the acquisition, and those are way too often different things, especially over the course of time.”

Historically, the department’s “large system integration model hasn’t been the most effective way of doing business — at least certainly not the most agile,” he said.

The military is driving innovation in technology because of its warfighting needs and sense of urgency, he added, “but that innovation hasn’t caught hold in how they acquire.”

Trey Hodgkins, vice president of national security and procurement policy at TechAmerica, an association that represents the technology industry, said: “We applaud what [Secretary Robert Gates] has spelled out, but we think there are impediments to getting there.… The rules haven’t changed. When I enter the government market, I still have to meet the same set of requirements I’ve always had to meet. My risks are as high as they ever have been. Things like bid protests push risks way up. You cannot enter a competition today and not prepare for bid protests.”

Until those things get addressed, perhaps through legislation or changes in behavior, the government won’t see the kinds of changes they want from contractors. “The risks haven’t changed,” he said. “It’s fact of life in the government market. It is one that impedes the ability to deal with what Secretary Gates outlined, and it is certainly going to slow us down in getting there.”

About the Author

Richard W. Walker is a freelance writer based in Maryland.

Reader Comments

Tue, Feb 2, 2010 Steve Silver Spring

DoD acquisition is fundamentally corrupt. It is about the acquisition offices and not about the end user. Best way to fix this is eliminate DoD sector monopoly contracts, such as Seaport, NETCENTS, ITES 2S, and the many many other IDIQs that serve the bureacratic interests of the acquisition offices and not the client. GSA offers a wide variety of schedules and GWAC that would cover most integration projects and alllow for serious competition. The same DoD Contract Officers could use them. GSA Assisted Services can be bypassed. Next the DoD IG needs to use a fair and reasonable standard for overwatch. In the past they have ignored serious abuses by DoD contract officers and even blamed GSA for DoD infractions using GSA vehicles. They ought to focus on recurring training lapses and purposeful violation (which is commonplace in my view).

Tue, Feb 2, 2010 Olde Sarge Northern VA

The government should eliminate the bid protest process. Advertise the contract. Review the bids. Award the contract. Require immediate IG and OMB review of the contract award process. If they validate the award, tough turkey. The loser should try harder next time. Stop wasting tax-payer money and denying the needed service/product to the people who need it with endless contract protests.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.


WT Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.