Thompson: Private sector may need to protect technology assets

To improve the nation's critical infrastructure protection, the Homeland Security Department and private companies may need to ensure secure operation of major IT systems, such as Internet and network functioning, according to the chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee.

Currently, only hard assets ? bridges, buildings, roads and facilities ? are part of the National Asset Database that forms the baseline for infrastructure protection efforts. That poses problems for the IT and communications industries because many of their assets are virtual, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said this week at a seminar at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

"While assets are considered for the Database, functions are not," Thompson said. "That is something that's very important to the IT and communications sectors, and we need to think about where the 'function' approach can be considered."

Thompson said he will make those considerations as he and other House and Senate members begin negotiations on the final version of the 9/11 Commission implementation legislation.

Industry councils for the 17 infrastructure sectors ? including energy, food, water, transportation and IT ? submitted their sector protection plans in December 2006 and those plans are currently under review by the Bush Administration. Thompson said those public-private partnerships may be strained if those reviews are not completed in a timely fashion.

"When you work extensively with the administration to complete things like sector-specific plans and they are held up in government bureaucracy, it is hard to not question the partnership," Thompson said.

In drafting HR 1, which is the 9/11 Commission bill, Thompson said he aimed for flexibility and information sharing among the private industry owners and government officials involved in infrastructure protection. The bulk of the infrastructure is owned by private industry.

"You should know that the committee understands that you cannot adopt a one-size-fits-all approach," Thompson. "It is all too-clear that 'risk' varies from sector to sector. We have to look at the dollar impact, resiliency and the possible domino effect that may be triggered by an attack on our infrastructure."

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.