Acquisition terms are worth their weight in gold
Get a handle on acquisition terms and conditions
Due diligence and the negotiation of terms and conditions in connection with mergers and acquisitions of government contractors have become increasingly complicated and protracted.
The terms and conditions of a transaction are as important as, if not more so than, the purchase price because they primarily relate to the buyer and seller sharing the risk.
This trend of deeper due diligence and more difficult negotiations is a product of several factors, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, increased board oversight, new Small Business Administration recertification rules, higher valuations, a changing procurement environment, serial buyers and private-equity groups becoming more sophisticated and experienced in the government, and increased use by buyers of experienced outside consultants and advisers.
Buyers are analyzing in detail small-business and set-aside contracts; compliance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation; retention of key management and employees; tax issues such as S Corporation status, the validity of revenue and earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization projections; and all legal and accounting systems and issues.
Over the years, a body of customary transaction terms for federal information technology transactions has developed. Some of the current trends relate to:
- Contingent consideration or earnouts.
- The form of the transaction ? stock purchase vs. asset purchase.
- Escrows and holdbacks.
- Retention of key employees.
- Representations and warranties.
- Indemnification.
- Noncompete agreements for sellers and key employees.