House Dem pushes IT policy as bipartisan agenda

Rep. Connelly suggests hearings on insourcing federal work and poaching contractors’ employees

Northern Virginia's House representative hopes the intense issue of insourcing government work may get a bipartisan touch in his House subcommittee.

Rep. Gerry Connelly (D-Va.), ranking member of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee’s Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations, and Procurement Reform Subcommittee, sent a memo Jan. 20 to the subcommittee’s chairman Rep. James Lankford (R-Okla.), laying out the procurement and IT issues as areas of common interest.

Related coverage:

Insourcing, cybersecurity provisions in canceled spending bill

Gates' insourcing plans stirs union, business groups to defend their side

“Outsourcing, in some cases, has proved to be more cost effective and efficient,” while some jobs must be done by federal employees, Connelly wrote in a memo that accompanied his letter to the chairman. “Striking the right balance between public and private workforce and providing the proper oversight and management for both is of paramount importance," he added.

Connelly suggested hearings on insourcing federal work and the poaching of contractors’ employees when agencies bring work in-house. The subcommittee should also consider requiring metrics to compare insourcing to cost-reductions and creating a process to analyze decisions on insourcing, instead of deciding arbitrarily.

The Obama administration is expected to soon release the final policy guidance on defining governmental functions and when agencies should be insourcing work that isn't inherently governmental for federal employees to do. The initial proposal was released a year ago, and it raised a lot of controversy.

At the same time, the Defense Department and other agencies have set policies and goals to take work away from contractors, causing companies and business groups to react aggressively. The previous Congress drove the insourcing initiative too. It pushed for greater insourcing in its appropriations bills and other legislation, going as far as stopping competitions for government contracts between private-sector companies and federal employees, which is referred to as competitive sourcing.

Last spring, the administration charted a course in its budget proposal showing that insourcing was a top priority for many departments—particularly DOD. Defense Secretary Robert Gates moved forward on that issue last summer to cut back on how it relies on contractors to reduce DOD’s spending.

In the government IT realm, Connelly also is interested in holding hearings on how the government monitors threats to its technology infrastructure and cybersecurity overall. He said the subcommittee also should review the potential savings from consolidating federal data centers through cloud computing.

“These are issues I have identified based on my past two years in Congress and two decades of experience in the private sector working with the business, procurement, and technology community in Northern Virginia and across the country,” Connelly wrote in the letter.

The full oversight committee is interested in these issues too, not just Lankford’s subcommittee.

Committee chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) said this week, the key pieces of his agenda are procurement reforms, updating technology and tracking how programs are managed.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Mon, Jan 24, 2011

They need to get rid of all federal 'non-workers'. Farm it all out to contractors. Those companies can hire and fire people alot cheaper and still give the big bosses big raises and bonuses.

Mon, Jan 24, 2011 David L Washington, DC

"Poaching contract employees" is done now, but is becoming less and less attractive, especially while Congress keeps threatening pay freezes. Face it, as a contractor, why would you work for the Fed if it was going to cost you money? Unless and until Congress adjusts the pay scales, and incentivizes IT workers with more than just "a job for life," the poaching will last only as long as the contractor being poached can put up with the boring repetition and lack of real challenge. We won't even talk about loss of job skills as the technology moves forward and the government stagnates.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


contracts DB