Conservative or progressive?

Telecoms juggle varying approaches to networking among federal agencies

IP Version 6

Government agencies are running IP Version 4, but the Office of Management and Budget is requiring them to implement the newest version, IPv6, by June 2008 to increase the amount of available space for moving voice, text, video and data across interconnected networks.

Agencies must use funds available in their already compressed budgets, because IPv6 is an unfunded mandate.

Furthermore, there's no template for the agencies to follow, said Henry Beebe, a vice president in charge of the Networx contract bid at AT&T Government Solutions. "It's fraught with unknowns," he said. Few agencies have set up internal test beds to try their applications in the new IPv6 environment, he added.


IP encryption is not used everywhere it's needed, even in the Defense Department's classified environment. It's also not readily available in the civilian agencies, said Diana Gowen, senior vice president of the government services division at Qwest Communications International Inc.
This problem is combined with a shortcoming in physically protecting IT equipment and information assets, especially as more federal employees telecommute and take notebook PCs out of government facilities. The use of BlackBerrys and PDAs also raises security issues.

In May, burglars stole a government-owned notebook and hard drives from a Veterans Affairs Department employee's home in Maryland. The hardware contained personal information, including names, Social Security numbers and birthdates of veterans.

In June, it was disclosed that in September 2005 a computer hacker had stolen a file with the names and Social Security numbers of employees who worked for the Energy Department's nuclear weapons agency.

In September, the Commerce Department reported that nearly 1,140 notebooks had been missing since 2001, including almost 250 from the U.S. Census Bureau; all of them contained personal information.


From federal workers in the field to first responders at disaster scenes and soldiers on the battlefield, the government needs mobility in its communications networks.

It is an area that will challenge not only the government, but also industry as they grapple with how to extend network architectures to accommodate a peripatetic set of customers, said Edward Carney, vice president and general manager of the government systems unit at Cisco Systems Inc.

"We're only scratching the surface ? of being able to fully address the requirements of a mobile set of customers and the scale that that implies," he said.

Crisis communication

In the wake of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and Hurricane Katrina, government has a great need for building applications that will support emergency response and notification systems. It must have redundant communications systems, such as satellite networks, as a backup for terrestrial systems that could be rendered inoperable by disasters.

"At this point, the agencies really need to think about implementing diversity in their networks," said Tony Bardo, assistant vice president for government solutions with Hughes Network Systems LLC of Germantown, Md. The company provides broadband satellite network equipment and services to government and business.

Operations planning

The Federal Emergency Management Agency is responsible for offering guidelines for agencies to create plans to ensure that essential government services are available during emergencies.

Because the federal telework initiative is a major part of this effort, agencies need to have the technology and network-enabled capabilities to support it.

Most agencies want to create a plan, but they don't all yet have the resources to do so, said Anthony D'Agata, vice president of public sector, federal at Sprint Nextel Corp. ? Roseanne Gerin

"There's a natural resistance to change if something is working well," says Anthony D'Agata, Sprint Nextel Corp.

Rick Steele

In a town where everything comes down to politics, two ideological factions divide the federal government's telecom market: conservatives and progressives.

Conservative federal agencies maintain a conventional, status-quo approach when it comes to telecommunications, while progressives embrace and implement new technologies at a fast clip.

"There certainly is a faction [of those that are] comfortable in their own shoes," said Anthony D'Agata, vice president of public sector-federal at Sprint Nextel Corp. "They have had network environments that are stable and have met their needs. There's a natural resistance to change if something is working well."

Other agencies want a new environment that can increase productivity and save money, D'Agata said, although he declined to name agencies that embrace convergence and those that have avoided it.

But in either case, telecommunications in the federal market continue to evolve into a comprehensive range of services that combine voice, data, video, wireless and satellite.

Swing set

The difference between conservative and progressive among agencies in the federal telecom marketplace hinges on convergence, or how well they integrate broadband Internet operations with landline and wireless networks to create a common, end-to-end network infrastructure. And some agencies are more converged than others.

The Defense Department has embraced convergence with its Global Information Grid-Bandwidth Expansion program, having spent $860 million thus far on the project. GIG-BE is the foundation of the Defense Information Systems Agency's network modernization efforts and will feature a high-speed, fiber-optic network that will expand Internet protocol connectivity while accommodating legacy command, control and communications systems.

The Social Security Administration is another shining example of convergence. The agency is moving into converged voice, data and video and has implemented these services in its call centers, said Diana Gowen, senior vice president of the government services division at Qwest Communications International Inc.

Social Security has issued a request for proposals for a 10-year, $200 million contract that will replace its telephone systems at specified offices with a nationwide, voice over IP-capable telephone network system. RFPs are due by Oct. 10.

The Labor Department's Job Corps also uses VoIP in its centers around the country, Gowen said.

By contrast, the more conservative Nuclear Regulatory Agency still has a frame-relay WAN with analog private lines, she said.

In both the Justice Department's Justice Unified Telecommunication Network (JUTNet ) and the Agriculture Department's Universal Telecommunications Network (UTN), agencies have blended telecom and IT capabilities, executives said. JUTNet is an IP voice, data and image network that will let agencies share information and provide enhanced security and continuity of operations. It will replace the department's Justice Consolidation Network network infrastructure.

The Agriculture Department's UTN data network backbone provides secure and robust telecom capabilities and enhanced network support services. The Justice Department is spending nearly $300 million a year on JUTNet, while the Agriculture Department is spending more than $110 million a year on UTN, according to FedSources Inc.

Three keys

Primarily, the agencies consider and buy telecom equipment and services based on their missions, needs and budgets, executives said.

The Treasury Department wants its own new network, the Treasury Communications Enterprise, and so does the IRS. They are at odds with what the General Services Administration is trying to do under its Networx program, said Abbas Yazdani, CEO of Artel Inc., a telecom and IT solutions company in Herndon, Va.

The 10-year, $20 billion Networx contract for telecom services will offer more than 50 core services, including wireless, satellite technologies and videoconferencing.

The program has two parts: a Universal part that will supply government locations with a range of telecom services nationwide, and an Enterprise part that will offer a mix of specialized IP or wireless services in specific geographical areas. GSA will issue multiple awards for Universal services in March 2007 and for Enterprise services in May 2007.

Those that embrace converged architectures can offer real-time information to users throughout their organizations, while others still knit their brows over security issues, said David Hawkins, vice president of engineering services at IT solutions provider Apptis Inc. He declined to name agencies that are slow to use converged technologies.

Although convergence has been a buzzword in the market for the last several years, IP and telecom have yet to be fully combined, some industry executives said.

"True convergence has not taken place," said Jerry Edgerton, group president of Verizon Communications Inc.'s federal division. "The steps are there, but it will be an evolutionary process, not a revolutionary process, as we go through it."

The government market already has attained technical convergence: the building of an IP infrastructure and integrating voice, video and data that was once separate, said John Johnson, GSA's acting assistant commissioner for Integrated Technology Services.

"From that aspect, we believe we are there, that we can provide comprehensive end-to-end solutions via the Networx contract and the future Alliant contract," he said. "Both of those contracts have positioned us exceptionally well to address the converged environment."

Alliant is GSA's 10-year, $65 billion procurement program that will let federal agencies buy a wide range of IT services. The agency will issue the final RFPs in October and award contracts in 2007. GSA plans to issue awards to between 25 and 30 companies for the $50 billion Alliant full-and-open contract, and between 40 and 60 awards for the $15 billion Alliant small-business contract.

Some industry executives agree with Johnson's assessment about the integration of IP and telecom operations.

"Are they converged? Not yet," said an executive at one of the carriers who declined to be named. "If that's true, then why the [Alliant and Networx] contracts? Why isn't there just one, which I think is GSA's vision but it's still a few years down the road."

Staff Writer Roseanne Gerin can be reached at

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


contracts DB