WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

DHS cancels ACE solicitation

IBM Corp. has been in a year-plus battle to keep part of the large Automated Customs Environment contract it has held for over a decade.

The company won the original $5 billion contract in 2001, but when the Homeland Security Department began recompeting the contract, it broke it up into a group of smaller contracts.

Last year, IBM’s subcontractor on ACE, Lockheed Martin Corp., won a nearly $70 million contract for software development and operations and maintenance of ACE. The contract was for five years.

But IBM filed a protest, as did Avaya. The Government Accountability Office dismissed those protests after DHS said it would take a corrective action and reevaluate bids. Lockheed won the contract again, which sparked more protests from IBM and Avaya.

Those protests were filed in August.

And the protests have again been dismissed, though Avaya’s is still officially listed as active. GAO apparently hasn’t updated its system.

But this time, DHS isn’t taking a corrective action. Instead, it has told GAO that it has cancelled the solicitation.

So, where does that leave us?

Presumably, the need is still there, so most likely IBM is continuing to provide that support under the current contract.

And DHS is back at square one. Though an agency spokesman hasn’t returned my call, it’s reasonable to assume that Customs and Border Protection will need to develop another procurement.

CBP was using the General Services Administration Schedule 70 for the contract because Eagle II wouldn’t be ready in time. But with this cancellation, Eagle II is probably a possibility again.

Whatever contract vehicle CBP uses, they’ll have to correct the problems that contributed to the protests.

I’m sure IBM is happy to still be in the running, as is Avaya. For Lockheed, it’s got to be a disappointment. How many times do you need to win a contract?

None of the companies had returned requests for comment Friday afternoon.

But the question I have is how much money are these companies spending to chase this contract? It seems there has to be a point where the right business decision is to just walk away.

I don’t know where that point is, but I’d be interested in hearing what others think.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Sep 05, 2014 at 11:50 AM


Reader Comments

Mon, Sep 8, 2014

Nick, here's a hint. Look at the percentage of bid losses over $50M that IBM protests. You will find, as is known around the Beltway, that IBM leads the world in loss protests. Ironically, Lockheed is likely #2. The rest of us are getting a good laugh that the two most litigious IT companies are firing on each other in this particular case.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our June 7 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More

  • PROJECT 38 PODCAST

    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman and senior staff writer Ross Wilkers discuss the major news events so far in 2019 and what major trends are on the horizon. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.