How SAVA grabbed the top spot on the 2011 Fast 50

Company books impressive 326 percent growth rate

SAVA Workforce Solutions’ revenues showed virtually no growth In 2006 and 2007, increasing a paltry $6,886 from $170,266 to $177,152.

A management change at the end of SAVA’s fiscal year in September 2008, brought in David Poirier as general manager. Annual revenues and employees began to increase almost immediately.

The company went from its initial four employees to 400 today, many of them with high-level security clearances. At the same time revenues jumped from $1.76 million in 2008 to $31.4 million in 2009, putting SAVA in the No. 2 spot on the 2010 Fast 50.

Last year, the company nearly doubled that figure, reporting $56.1 million, putting SAVA in the No. 1 position on the 2011 Fast 50 with a five-year, compound annual growth rate of 326.05 percent.

“We just got a lot more focused about our business development,” Poirier replied when asked to explain the soaring numbers.

“We worked really, really hard and we tried to find out exactly what our customers’ issues were and how we might be able to help them,” he said.

Poirier also attributes the extraordinary growth to SAVA’s focused concentration on its three customer communities – defense, intelligence, and law enforcement and security.

SAVA calls its triad business strategy “Connecting Common Missions.”

He cited as an example the company’s expertise in terrorist watch list technology and database management that has led to classified work across the intelligence community.

“Business process management has been big for us; we’re pretty strong in that and we’ve helped some government clients become much more efficient because we understood their world,” he said. “We had an idea how we might automate some things for them that used to be somewhat manual or completely manual.”

SAVA also has made a concerted effort to hire only exceptionally talented people and to pay them accordingly by keeping company overhead as low as possible – no corporate jets or excessive parties and functions, and “not over the top” office space, Poirier said.

“The more revenue we can put into hiring quality people, the better the payoff there’s going to be for us,” he added. “And that has paid off.”

The company also takes a conservative approach to acquisitions – it has made none – and to its contract bids.

“We bid not to make a lot of profit but to have growth on volume instead of trying to achieve a certain amount of margin on each deal,” he explained.

Poirier credited recognition of the company’s recent past performance for SAVA having been selected last October as one of the prime vendors on the FBI’s eight-year, $30 billion Information Technology Supplies and Support Services contract vehicle.

So far, SAVA has not won any of the few low-priced task orders that have been issued.

“But two years before [our] bid went in, there wasn’t much to SAVA. It’s difficult to compete on something like that when you don’t have many, many years of past performance,” he said.

“I think what helps you compete and win in situations like that is the past performance that you have is exceptional and ours is on every contract that we’ve performed on. And our pricing is really, really good,” he added.

Poirier said he is now looking into enterprise IT solutions “that are a little bit more creative than we see today” as perhaps SAVA’s next area of opportunity in the government market.

“There are lots of things that are changing in that area,” he said, adding that SAVA is looking at some innovative information security ideas such as a low cost way to protect data as it flows across the enterprise.

Poirier acknowledged that he remains optimistic about the future of federal contracting even as the government is leaning toward more insourcing.

He said the key to winning contracts in this fiscally tight era is to bid with the best people you can, and that goes back to his decision to balance top talent and cost-cutting.

“If your overhead rates are low,” he explained, “you’ll stand a better chance of winning."

About the Author

David Hubler is the former print managing editor for GCN and senior editor for Washington Technology. He is freelance writer living in Annandale, Va.

Reader Comments

Mon, Mar 19, 2012

Of course it makes sense Dave Poirier goes into an ANC 8(a). No cap and millions upon millions in set-asides. He's not even an Alaskan Native, but that's besides the point. Not too many 8(a)s in the terrorist watch technologies. Those types of contracts are more in line with the northrop grummans. Soul source to an 8(a) with no cap on defense is a monopoly.

Fri, Oct 28, 2011 Vet Fan

Colonel Poirier served his country with great honor and hard work, leading the investigative team that caught Saddam Hussein. This firm is impressive because it brings that love of country to its business with the federal government - delivering, as far as I can tell, strong results. At the end of the day, that's what really matters.

Wed, Sep 7, 2011 Ju

This company should not even be in the list. They are an Alaskan Native company with sole source advantage and has no real capabilities. Maybe congress should start a hearing on these guys!

Wed, Aug 31, 2011

SAVA just beat out my company in a price shootout. So it's obvious they can compete.

Thu, Aug 4, 2011

Oh, and let's also be sure we mention that the parent company of SAVA is NANA, a $ONE BILLION DOLLAR company Again, this is ridiculous.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


contracts DB