Bill would put job creation pressure on contractors

Companies would estimate in bids how many jobs a contract would create

Under a new House bill, an important factor in judging contract bids would be how many jobs a company says it could create if it was awarded a federal contract, but the company could suffer for an inaccurate assessment.

Companies would include in their proposals a “jobs impact statement.” The statement would tell the government the number of jobs a company believes it and its subcontractors may create, or at least not end, in the United States. The statement would also be “a guarantee from the offeror” that U.S. jobs would not be shipped overseas after the government awarded the contract.

Five House members introduced the American Jobs Matter Act (H.R. 1435) April 4.

The measure would require that, six months after making an award, the contracting officer would monitor the company’s numbers in its statement compared with actual job numbers. With those reviews, the contracting officer would have to track the numbers throughout the life of the contract, and compare the number of jobs with the jobs impact statement. The point would be is to see if the company was correct or missed its estimate.

The jobs statement and the agency evaluations would become a major factor for a company in future contract competitions.

“If the number of jobs that the agency estimates will be created by using the jobs impact statement significantly exceeds the number of jobs created or retained, then the agency may evaluate whether the contractor should be proposed for debarment,” according to the bill.

The bill was referred to the Government Reform and Oversight Committee and the Armed Services Committee.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Wed, Apr 13, 2011

I think it is an excellent idea that has the potential to improve Gov. Contractor job retention, and overall environment. Great proposal!!!

Mon, Apr 11, 2011 Omnius Alexandria

More stupidity from people who should pay attention to real problems instead of chasing butterflies. I am a vendor and see this as entirely ridiculous. How about the reverse -- can I add a statement about how many jobs I would lose if I were not awarded the contract? Remember, a good part of the vendor services that exists are for current work. Do I, as the incumbent, get any bones? BTW, who will do the work of tracking the contractors numbers? Oh, contractors, of course! And having one contractor track another contractor's numbers - no Conflict of Interest there, eh?

Mon, Apr 11, 2011

Another silly legislation. Businesses have been impacted so adversely by the lack of busget and shut down scares that they are barely holding on. Govt has not paid vendors, is not awarding contracts and now another legislation.How about getting rid of legilsation and allow us to create jobs without the govt in the way

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.