Administration will seek limits on some contracts
- By Matthew Weigelt
- Feb 26, 2009
The Obama administration intends to reform federal contracting by limiting the use of certain types of contracts, according to its fiscal 2010 budget proposal released today.
Administration officials want to review sole-source and cost-type contracts, such as performance-based contracts or contracts with award fees. Cost-type contracts are particularly vulnerable to waste since they provide no incentive to control costs, the budget proposal states. Those contract types increased more than 75 percent under President George W. Bush’s administration.
Meanwhile, the new stimulus law requires agencies to enter fixed-price contracts to the maximum extent possible. Officials say fixing a contract's price at the beginning offers the most incentive for the contractor to control costs while exposing the government to the least risk. However some experts say fixed-price contracts increase costs because the companies raise their prices to offset the added risk.
The administration also said it's concerned about handing too much work to contractors; the budget says officials plan to clarify what the government considers an inherently governmental function.
An inherently governmental function is work that only a federal employee can perform. It’s “a function that is so intimately related to the public interest as to mandate performance by government employees,” according to a 1992 policy letter from the Office of Federal Procurement Policy.“Critical government functions will not be performed by the private sector for purely ideological reasons,” the budget document states.
Many of these areas are being dealt with by Congress. The fiscal 2009 Omnibus Appropriations Act, which the House passed Feb. 25, would require a clarification of what is inherently governmental work.
In addition, administration officials say companies have benefited by the growth of federal contracting. Government spending on contracts more than doubled from about $208 billion in 2000 to more than $423 billion in 2006 while the number of officers overseeing these contracts remained flat. Congress has appropriated funds to build up the acquisition workforce, but agencies say they can't find people to fill the jobs.
Also, the budget proposal states that the value of contracts not subject to full-and-open competition grew from $48.6 billion to $112.5 billion from 2000 to 2006. However, some experts say the percentage of federal contracts that are competed among contractors has remained steady despite the growth in spending.
Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.