SBA, GSA still wrangle over small biz recertification

It could take months for the General Services Administration and the Small Business Administration to agree on how often small businesses selling to the federal government should recertify their size, GSA official David Drabkin said today at a conference held by the Coalition for Government Procurement.

"We are still working with SBA, but we are still without a draft to share with you. We expect to resolve this in the next year," Drabkin told industry and government representatives.

The small-business designation allows companies to bid on contracts set aside only for these businesses.

Small businesses have complained about the current size rule, saying they are losing multiple-award contracting opportunities because agencies are counting orders given to large businesses toward their small-business contracting goals.

The SBA published a proposed rule in April that would require small businesses that receive a multiple-award schedule or other multiple-award contracts to annually certify that they continue to meet the size standard for a small business.

Under SBA regulation, a business is considered small over the life of its contract with the procuring agency ? up to 20 years ? even if it grows large during that time.

GSA, on the other hand, took action in October 2002 to require recertification on its contracts after every five-year period. GSA officials had asked SBA officials to change the size rule for several years, and eventually decided to take action themselves, said Drabkin, GSA's deputy associate administrator for acquisition policy.

SBA "can't get to a final rule" that would apply governmentwide "because there's a lot of discussion about what the right answer is," Drabkin said. No matter what the SBA decides, some group of government contractors will be disappointed, he said.

Drabkin said he thinks the SBA's proposed annual recertification isn't the right answer, nor are legislative proposals to require more frequent recertification.

"The right answer isn't having rerepresentation after one year of a two-year base period," he said, because most companies' size doesn't change that often, and also because the government's information systems don't allow for a change in size in the middle of a performance period.

Members of Congress who are advocating change "are right to be frustrated, but the solution is to change the rules," not enact a legislative fix, Drabkin said. That's because laws take too long to change when the government's contracting needs change, he said.

"If the way we do business changes, we should be able to change the rules without going to Congress," Drabkin said.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More


    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.