Defense Science Board: Procurement Policies Hurting Industry

Defense Science Board: Procurement Policies Hurting Industry

By Nick Wakeman, Senior Editor


NOV. 30 ? Policies that guide the way the government buys weapons systems and other high-technology items are weakening the competitiveness and profitability of the defense industry, according to a new report released this week by the Defense Science Board.


To address these concerns, the board is recommending a variety of changes, such as streamlining procurement regulations and making it easier to export defense technology to close U.S. allies.


Because many of the procurement regulations that the board wants changed also dictate how the rest of the government buys goods and services ? including information technology ? any changes would have an impact beyond the defense industry, said Philip Odeen, vice chairman of the science board and the leader of the task force that wrote the report. Odeen also is executive vice president of Washington operations for TRW Inc. of Cleveland.


The report recommends the government rely more on "share-in-savings" clauses in contracts. Under most contracts, the contractor has no incentive to find cheaper ways to perform its work because the government keeps all of the savings.


The report also recommends that companies be allowed to earn a higher profit margin on successful contracts, especially when cost, schedule and performance goals are met.


While the report is focused specifically on the defense and aerospace industry, IT companies face many of the same issues, Odeen said.


"I think [the recommendations] will help anyone doing business with the government," he said.


The Defense Science Board is an advisory group to the secretary of defense. The group is composed of leaders in the areas of science and technology and their application in military operations.


The report recommended that government contract personnel be trained to take advantage of current procurement regulations. Some procurement officers avoid risk because they are afraid that they won't be supported if they try new approaches, said the report.


Odeen said the government already is acting to implement some of the recommendations. For example, regulations have been proposed that would allow companies to pass on to the government part of the cost to recruit and retain technology workers. In addition, regulations have been proposed to reward cost-reduction measures by contractors.


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More

  • PROJECT 38 PODCAST

    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.