Can the administration really trim $6B from support services contracts?

Obama administration officials say that by the end of fiscal 2012, they intend to cut $6 billion in spending on contracts for support services that help managers in various ways.

Senior officials at the Office of Management and Budget said their goal is to reduce the $40 billion in spending on management support services by 15 percent in little more than a year.


Related story:

Budget proposes cuts to some service contracts


In the past decade, agencies have bought more and more of those services, also called advise-and-assist and knowledge-based services. Spending increased from $10 billion in 2000 to $40 billion in 2010, officials said during a gathering at the White House today to announce the new goal.

Watch the event.

Officials say they have set their sights on those contracts because the government cannot afford them, they might come close to blurring the line between what a contractor does and what only a federal employee should be doing, or they might not be useful to the government.

“Sometimes agencies are spending money on consultants to write reports that really don’t go anywhere,” said Jeffrey Zients, deputy director for management at OMB. "They sit on the shelf."

“The most obvious reason [for the cuts] is that’s where the money is,” said Dan Gordon, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy. "That’s where the spending is."

Such contracts often pose a greater risk of cost overruns than contracts with a fixed price. Gordon said 74 percent of services contracts are cost-reimbursement or time-and-materials contracts. Only 36 percent have a firm price.

Cost-reimbursement contracts provide for payment of allowable incurred costs. For time-and-materials contracts, a company charges the government for labor hours and the materials for the project.

As for the 15 percent reduction, Gordon said the goal is not a call for insourcing and is not “a numbers game.” Agency officials cannot relabel a contract and say they've reduced their spending.

“We will work through this with the agencies to be sure [reductions are] done intelligently,” Gordon said. “We’re going to be watching.”

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Fri, Jul 8, 2011

Eliminate all the non-mission-related consulting contracts, like the ones for 'improving employee climate and culture', or 'diversity training'. Then eliminate the ones to write the slick multi-media slide shows for the 40+ hours of mandatory annual breifings we all have to suffer through, at least for the ones where reg or policy has not changed. There is lots of low-hanging fruit out there, but nobody has the guts to say 'this is stupid', and in fact they get awards for chairing these silly projects.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.