SAIC case raises red flags

After being found guilty by a federal jury of fraud and false claims under the Federal False Claims Act, Science Applications International Corp.'s case is shedding new light on conflicts of interest with government contractors, according to an article by The Washington Post.

While the company still maintains its innocence and is considering an appeal, the case does bring attention to the fact that sometimes contractors do receive insider knowledge of other projects and contracts that may allow them an edge ? either by helping to write rules that would benefit them, by suggesting new projects that they hope to win or by receiving firsthand knowledge that would aid them in winning a contract. Often these conflicts of interest are not noticed or, due to the shortage in the government acquisition workforce and increase in outsourcing, nothing is done about them.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More

  • PROJECT 38 PODCAST

    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.