Contractor bonus calls NOAA's oversight into question

Lawmakers would like to know why the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration awarded a bonus fee to a contractor working on weather satellite programs suffering from schedule delays and significant cost overruns.

At a hearing July 10, the Government Accountability Office reported that cost estimates for both the National Polar-orbiting Environmental Satellite System and the next-generation Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellite-R have nearly doubled, despite the fact that NOAA is now asking for fewer satellites with fewer capabilities. The first launch date for NPOESS, originally scheduled for 2009, has now slipped to 2013.

Members of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee told NOAA officials they did not understand why the contractor for NPOESS, Northrop Grumman, would receive a $123 million bonus.

Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) disapproved of the bonus, saying it was a failure of NOAA to reward the contractor even as the agency removed vital climate change sensors from the satellites.

Committee members also questioned the oversight of NPOESS. On the one hand, the three agencies overseeing the program ? NOAA, NASA and the Defense Department ? seemed unable to assign tasks to one another properly, said Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.).

On the other, Nelson also questioned why NOAA would be responsible for the launch of the satellites instead of NASA. "You've got a Hydra-headed monster here that can't decide which way it wants to go," Nelson said.

Mary Kicza, assistant administrator of satellite and information services at NOAA, said her agency has since taken control of ground systems and made NASA responsible for the development of instruments, spacecraft and launch equipment.

The NPOESS and GOES-R satellites would orbit Earth's equator and poles to monitor worldwide weather patterns.

Wade-Hahn Chan writes for Federal Computer Week, an 1105 Government Information Group publication.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.