Input: States unsure of Schedule 70

States will continue to make most of their large purchases through the competitive purchasing process rather than use the General Services Administration's Schedule 70, according to a new report from the market research firm Input Inc., Reston, Va.

The report, "Schedule 70 and Cooperative Purchasing: A Slow Start to IT Spending," finds that state purchases through the GSA schedule currently represent less than 1 percent of total state and local IT spending.

State and local governments purchased just $33 million in goods and services through IT schedule contracts from October to February, according to the report.

"While some states are slowly beginning to use cooperative purchasing for small IT purchases, many are experiencing challenges and find more favorable pricing by competitively bidding projects," said Marcus Fedeli, Input's manager of state and local opportunity products.

The shortcomings of Schedule 70 for state and local governments are:

  • A failure to provide best value when compared to the competitive bidding process

  • A lack of communications between parties that makes buyers unaware of the benefits of cooperative purchasing

  • A disparity between state laws and cooperative purchasing

Despite this, Input estimates that by 2006 state and local IT spending through Schedule 70 could exceed $250 million. This will come about in part as states work to change restrictions they have in place that discourage cooperative purchasing.

The federal government extended its buying power to state and local governments through the E-Government Act of 2002.

Congress opened up the GSA Federal Supply Service Schedule 70 to state and local governments to assist them in getting discounts on commercial items they could not obtain on their own because of the small volumes they buy.

Because of these challenges and the many federal purchasing terms imposed on state buyers by Schedule 70, the IT community is likely to see states continue to make big purchases using their own competitive processes, Fedeli said.

"Despite the reported benefits in procurement cost savings, historical jurisdictional friction often causes state governments to avoid undertakings with the federal government," he said.

About the Author

William Welsh is a freelance writer covering IT and defense technology.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.