POGO argues for release of past-performance information

Government officials continue to withold contractor reviews in Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System

A government watchdog group is criticizing federal officials for their decision to withhold contractors’ past performance evaluations from public scrutiny, even though the information often is available by searching the Internet. Neil Gordon, an investigator at the Project for Government Oversight, made that argument in a blog post published Jan. 27 on POGO.org.

Gordon’s post comes days after the Government Accountability Office publicly released the details of a commissary contractor's record of unsanitary conditions and unsafe practices that the Defense Department allegedly ignored in awarding a commissary contract to the company.


RELATED ARTICLES

Fed contractors' history could be open to public in April 


Can we radically improve service contract management?


GAO included a company’s performance evaluation by the Defense Commissary Agency in its decision regarding a bid protest, which it sustained. The document, which was released Jan. 26, includes a chart that grades the company, Nayyarsons Corp., on its work in areas such as quality of the food and service and overall customer satisfaction. GAO ruled that the Nayyarsons’ work didn’t match the grades commissary agency officials gave the corporation.GAO found emails from DOD officials about “serious problems,” for example, with the sushi at a commissary in Memphis, Tenn. The company used expired food and produced food in unsanitary conditions, according to GAO.

Gordon wrote that since GAO gave out this information on Nayyarsons’ evaluation, government officials should completely open up the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System. FAPIIS is a central site filled with information on companies from numerous other federal databases, such as the Excluded Parties List System and the Past Performance Information Retrieval System.

FAPIIS initially was intended as a central repository for contracting officers and other federal officials and not the public. In 2010, a provision in a supplemental appropriations bill required the government to open the database to the public. Agencies can block only contractors’ past performance reviews.

Business groups have argued against making FAPIIS completely open, particularly the evaluations and past performance reviews. The evaluations could make people in the community rush to judgment about a company. And any errors in the evaluations or even untimely data agencies added late to a review could tarnish a company’s reputation.

This week too, the Obama administration announced that the FAPIIS site would open its doors in mid-April.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.