DHS too timid with debarment hammer, IG says

In 23 cases of failed contracts, no reviews for debarment or suspension were performed, according to IG Richard Skinner

Homeland Security Department contracting officials are reluctant to pursue suspension and debarment actions against contractors even when those actions may be warranted, according to a new audit released today by DHS Inspector General Richard Skinner.

DHS initiated 10 debarment cases and one suspension case from October 2003 to September 2008. The debarments related to violations of immigration laws, fraud and business integrity rules.

However, department officials are not aggressively pursuing debarments, Skinner wrote. The IG identified 23 cases in which a contract was terminated for default or cause, but the contract was not subsequently reviewed to see whether a debarment or suspension was appropriate.

“The Department of Homeland Security has suspension and debarment policies and procedures in place. However, the department is reluctant to apply the policies and procedures against poorly performing contractors,” Skinner wrote.

"Department procurement officials characterized the suspension and debarment process as being too resource-intensive, punitive and as negatively impacting the size of the contractor pool. The procurement officials prefer to use other administrative remedies to address poor contractor performance,” the report stated.

But reluctance to pursue suspension and debarment actions could put the government at risk of doing business with poor contractors, Skinner warned.

In addition, DHS officials are making no written record of their findings and evidence when they terminate contracts in default. In 21 cases where contracts were canceled for default, the reasons were not recorded in government-wide databases, Skinner wrote.

Even though the Federal Acquisition Regulation does not require that agencies document the reasons for such terminations, Skinner said it is in the government’s best interests to provide detailed rationales to reduce the risks of additional contract failures.

The IG recommended that DHS develop policies to ensure that contracts that are terminated for cause are evaluated for possible suspension or debarment actions as well as policies to record all pertinent information on contractor performance.

DHS officials agreed with the recommendations and have taken steps to improve their policies and procedures on suspension and debarment, the report concluded.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Sat, Mar 13, 2010

When a government employee fails to take the action required against a contractor that is DERELICTION OF DUTY. The government employee should be reprimanded or terminated the only course open to get the contracting officials to obey the law. This problem is endemic throughout the government GAO, VA and SBA fail to debar firms that bid on contracts and make fraudulent statements on set asides that they are Service Disabled Veteran Owned and are found not to be. Make an example of a few contracting officers and the rest will learn to do their jobs.

Mon, Mar 8, 2010

It's odd to hear the DHS IG Office criticize others in DHS for unwillingness to act on illegal or unethical activities. That office has overtly refused to investigate illegal actions by (now former) senior political appointees that were reported formally to it. It's the IG's job to investigate internal wrongdoing, but perhaps that's "too resource-intensive" and they are more comfortable criticizing others? Sounds like "Do as I say, not as I do."

Wed, Mar 3, 2010

This is a clasic case of an agency that is still struggling to find itself, and discover its mission. It is very hard to point to any one process improvement we have received as a result of billions of dollars being thrown at it. As a central authority for Intelligence, it has provel a complete and total failure. It may be time to pull the plug and lower the deficit.

Wed, Mar 3, 2010

DHS from its inception, became the dumping ground for all contributing agencies for substandard and troublesome personnel, and they have been struggling ever since to get a handle on recovery. Cronyism, protectionism and a general lack of desire to improve permiates the place. the only agancy that is worse is Energy.

Tue, Mar 2, 2010

> I find it disturbing that foreign nationals are working on anything to do with DHS. Especially if management finds itself too busy to control or oversee contractor work - maybe its time DHS hired only US citizens directly - there is certainly no shortage of available and qualified individuals to do these jobs.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.


WT Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.