EAC accredits InfoGuard lab for state voting

InfoGuard Labs has been accepted by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to evaluate state voting systems under the commission's accreditation program.

InfoGuard is the third lab to be accredited since the commission began the full program earlier this year. In February, iBeta Quality Assurance and SysTest Labs received the first two accreditations.

This program marks the first time that the federal government has assumed responsibility for assuring the reliability of systems used for casting votes in federal elections. The job had been performed by the National Association of State Election Directors, but the Help America Vote Act of 2002 mandated that EAC take over the task. Independent labs are evaluated for technical ability by the National Institute of Standards and Technology under its National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program. EAC then evaluates the labs on nontechnical issues such as conflict-of-interest policies, organizational structure and recordkeeping protocols.

EAC uses results of laboratory testing to certify voting systems. Systems can be certified against 2002 Voting System Standards used by NASED or against EAC's 2005 Voluntary Voting System Guidelines. Starting in December, systems no longer will be certified against the 2002 standards.

As the name implies, the program is voluntary, but at least 39 states required certification of voting systems under the NASED program, and most states are expected to require some certification under the current program.

EAC was established by HAVA to address programs of the disputed 2000 presidential election. In the wake of the election many states began updating voting systems, with many moving to electronic systems using touch-screen computer terminals. Concerns have been raised about the security and reliability of many electronic systems, and the Voluntary Voting System Guidelines include a requirement for a voter-verifiable paper trail in any electronic system. Such a paper trail or other independently auditable components would become mandatory under several bills now before Congress.

William Jackson writes for Government Computer News, an 1105 Government Information Group publication.

About the Author

William Jackson is a Maryland-based freelance writer.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our July 12 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More

  • PROJECT 38 PODCAST

    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman and senior staff writer Ross Wilkers discuss the major news events so far in 2019 and what major trends are on the horizon. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.