Group knocks DHS advisory panel's stance on RFID for human identification

An internal advisory group within the Homeland Security Department is making incorrect generalizations about radio frequency identification technology and has offered no scientific evidence to back up its claims, an IT industry trade group charged Wednesday.

The American Electronics Association, a trade association representing 2,700 companies, issued a statement objecting to a draft report on RFID for human identification issued earlier this month by DHS' Emerging Applications and Technology Subcommittee. The subcommittee is part of the Data Privacy and Integrity Committee, which advises the department.

RFID tags are tiny computer chips that can transmit data, and allow data to be read, remotely. The subcommittee's draft report said RFID might be appropriate for human identification in very limited situations, such as for tracking miners and firefighters. But in general, it recommended that "RFID be disfavored for identifying and tracking human beings."

The high-tech executives group disapproved of the draft report findings and what they termed a lack of evidence in the report.

"There are many sweeping, unsubstantiated and incorrect generalizations made (about RFID) without pointing to scientific data, field tests or published reports," stated the electronics association in a statement.

"Because the Draft Report disparages RFID technology without citing quantitative data, generalizes RFID technology and its applications, and arrives at conclusions not substantiated by fact, the Department may not arrive at the proper conclusions for protecting America's security," the electronics group said.

A shortcoming of the draft report, for example, is its generic definition of RFID that does not specify the differences in various types of RFID, the electronics association said. For example, RFID chips to be used on U.S. passports are protected by encryption and access controls. On the other hand, ultra-high-frequency RFID is designed for tracking items in a warehouse.

On May 19, the Smart Card Alliance, a trade group, representing makers of biometric smart cards, most of which use RFID, also issued a statement disagreeing with the subcommittee's draft report.

"We believe that the report defines RFID too broadly and, therefore, this recommendation will unduly restrict appropriate and secure applications of smart cards with [radio frequency] technology that can meet the strictest privacy and security requirements," the alliance said in a statement.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.