9/11 report might give IT spending a boost

The recommendations of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, if implemented, could expand the federal government's use of information technology, according to testimony at a House Government Reform Committee hearing today.

For example, Rep. Candice Miller (R-Mich.), said the government should set standards for secure identification documents, such as birth certificates and drivers' licenses, as the 9/11 Commission recommended. Its report was published July 22.

"It's an almost ridiculously simple recommendation," Miller said. "A number of states issue drivers' licenses without requiring primary identity documents. I think that's a tremendous problem. We could use biometrics."

John Lehman, a member of the 9/11 Commission, said the group was particularly proud of its ID standards recommendation.

"While some of us were sympathetic to the idea of national identity card, others were sympathetic to privacy issues. We came up with what is as close to a perfect solution as we could get. It's not a national identity card, yet it gives all the security benefits that a national ID would have."

Lehman also said CAPPS II, the Computer-Assisted Passenger Prescreening System that identifies potentially dangerous airline travelers, should be implemented. It was put on hold last month by the Homeland Security Department because of data privacy concerns. A department spokeswoman said then that the system would be redesigned.

The CAPPS I system identified six of the 9/11 terrorists, but they were not stopped because government agents were looking for explosives, not those particular people, Lehman said. CAPPS II is not perfect, but it is more sophisticated, he said.

Bob Kerrey, another commission member, said more money is needed to speed up some homeland security projects, such as the U.S. Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator System. U.S. Visit, which tracks the entry and exit of foreign visitors to the United States, is not set to be finished until 2010, Kerrey said. The project could be worth up to $10 billion.

"There are a number of areas where funding is a problem, particularly in border security," Kerrey said. "2010 is too darn slow."

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.