WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

How to make an $871M contract protest proof

When a contract with a ceiling of $871 million comes across the wire, two things go through my mind:

  • Who won?
  • Who’s going to protest?

It’s a sad commentary on the market, but I think a lot of people ask the same two questions.

So, as I wrote up the Defense Information Systems Agency announcement of its $871.4 million contract award to seven companies, I knew that I’d have to start monitoring the protest docket on the Government Accountability Office’s website.

But when I got to the bottom of the announcement, I happily realized I could take GAO off of my to-do list. Because DISA derailed the protest process.

The agency only received seven proposals. I’m not a math whiz, but having seven proposals and seven winners leaves exactly zero companies that can file a protest.

I have no idea if this was DISA’s strategy or if they just got lucky, but either way, it’s good for the agency.

Look at the seven winners:

  • Alion Science and Technology Corp.
  • American Systems Corp.
  • CGI Group
  • Lockheed Martin
  • ManTech International
  • Science Applications International Corp.
  • TASC Inc.

These aren’t fly-by-night companies; each can boast of qualifications that match DISA’s needs.

Which would you eliminate that wouldn’t open DISA to a protest or two? Even if DISA prevailed, it would delay the start of this contract by months.

What’s the advantage to DISA and the users of the contract if there are five winners or seven? Is there a disadvantage by picking all seven?

I can’t think of any.

So hats off to DISA for making seven awards and thereby getting to jump into this contract with little delay.

Now it’s time for these companies to fight it out, task order by task order. More companies, more competition, better prices and better solutions.

What’s not to like?

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Aug 06, 2012 at 9:53 AM

Reader Comments

Wed, Aug 8, 2012

Having worked on the previous contract for a number of years I can tell you that the government has had significant issue getting all task orders out for competition in a timely manner with award decision lingering for weeks or even months and that was with three prime contractors. Imagine how much additional work is required by the government when they must now evaluate up to 7 responses, make awards and then begin work. I'm not sure how much benefit will be realized after the significant overhead investment by both government and contractor is expended. This of course does not take into consideration the personal frustration that will be experienced by both government and contractor employees.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012

Really good first comment. It is amazing that government often ignores these costs. Take the calculations up a level. Another back of the envelope: The gov't IT business is $80B for contractors. I think a good B&P estimate for this segment of the industry is at least 2% of this amount or $1.6B. I can safely say, in my experience, the inefficiences caused by procurement delays, failure of the government to annouce procurement strategies in a timely manner, protests, efforts to protect against protest, raw time trying to get enough solid info to make a good bid decision, poorly worded RFP's etc etc cause a 50% ineffciency factor. THUS, taxpayers pay about $800M per year for this inefficiency just in the IT industry(and since everyone seems to calculate costs over 10 years these days) or $8B over the next decade. How about the inefficiencies in other segments of procurement? I'll bet the numbers in other areas are equally as large. Nick, you are usually on point but I am not so sure this time.

Tue, Aug 7, 2012

Wow! More companies, more competition, better prices and better solutions. What is that they say about better-faster-cheaper? Pick one, or maybe two; you'll never get all three. Let's see: 7 companies bidding on 600 (or 782 if you read the RFP carefully) task orders per year with 10-page technical proposals plus cost proposals for each one. How much manpower on both the government's side and the contractor's side does that add up to? This was a 2-year procurement exercise. Those companies will all be recovering those B&P costs on top of their contract administration costs through the execution of these seven contracts. Back-of-the envelope calculation using 10% G&A x $871M = $87M. Multiply that by 7? No, that wouldn't be fair, would it? How about we just throw in an inefficiency factor of 2: $180M. Wait! Let's throw in the recent OPM requirements: agencies must reduce contractor support services manpower costs to below 2010 levels. What we lose in inefficiencies we can make up at the expense of the people doing the work. Unless, of course, those people exit for more stable jobs elsewhere (even if they pay less). But don't worry, less experienced, less expensive people will fill in for the 900 or so positions involved. What was that about better-faster-cheaper?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

WT Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.