Bollinger challenges Northrop in lawsuit

Bollinger Shipyards has filed a lawsuit against Northrop Grumman Ship Systems Inc. seeking $12 million to settle claims related to the remaking of Deepwater cutters that were rejected by the Coast Guard.

Bollinger Shipyards Lockport LLC was a subcontractor to Northrop Grumman on a Deepwater Systems contract to extend 49 Coast Guard cutters from 110 feet to 123 feet. The Coast Guard refused to accept the first eight renovated boats for service because of major structural flaws. It also sought a refund for the eight cutters.

Bollinger's 15-page complaint was filed on Oct. 16 in the U.S. District Court in the Eastern District of Louisiana. Bollinger is seeking arbitration.

According to the complaint, Northrop Grumman notified Bollinger to stop work in July 2005 after Bollinger had delivered six boats and begun work on six more boats.

Bollinger said it suffered damages resulting from the termination totaling $15.6 million, and it asked Northrop Grumman to pay that amount, but the company refused. In January Bollinger adjusted the amount of damages to $12 million.

In the lawsuit, Bollinger claims that Northrop Grumman "through its sole negligence, delivered late, ill-defined specifications and drawings to Bollinger. Bollinger needed this information in a timely manner to efficiently perform its subcontract." Northrop Grumman officials were not immediately available for comment.

In September, the Coast Guard awarded a contract worth up to $1.5 billion to Bollinger for design and construction of the Fast Response Cutter as part of the Deepwater asset replacement program. Marinette Marine Corp. filed a bid protest with the Government Accountability Office over the award Oct. 7.

The watchdog group Project on Government Oversight expressed concerns about the new Bollinger award because of the lack of resolution on the refund and on the earlier cutters taken out of service.

"While POGO does not believe in treating companies as guilty before it has been proven, one would think that the Coast Guard would be more wary of awarding this contract to a company with a history of past poor performance, especially since the Coast Guard asked for a $96 million refund," stated a POGO news release.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More

  • PROJECT 38 PODCAST

    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.