Fast 50 clarification

The compound annual growth rate used to rank the 2007 Fast 50 was incorrectly calculated.

The mistake affects the CAGR number, but the order of the rankings does not change.

The formula to calculate CAGR is as follows: CAGR = (FV/PV)1/n ? 1. 1/n is an exponent. For the Fast 50, PV is revenue for 2006; FV is revenue for 2002; and N is 4.

Unfortunately, we used 5 for N, which gave all the companies a lower number for their CAGR.

The numbers are correct on our Web site. However, the Sept. 17 issue print edition of Washington Technology will contain the incorrect CAGR figures. The mistake was discovered after the issue went to press.

However, the rankings of the companies in print is correct, because the same mistake was made in calculating the CAGR for all the companies.

A chart with the correct numbers will appear in the Oct. 1 issue of Washington Technology.

We deeply regret this error and any confusion it may cause.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.