Quick Study

By Brian Robinson

Blog archive

Feds may require cybersecurity credential for workforce

Reports are emerging about recommendations that the Commission on Cybersecurity for the 44th Presidency will make to the Obama administration that will require government and contractor employees involved in cybersecurity be formally certified.

The commission is a group overseen by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, and published its first report on securing cyberspace in December 2008. It’s expected to issue its follow-up report later this month or in early July.

That’s likely to spur a debate about just what a cybersecurity credential is, versus that for regular IT security. There are many people involved in the cybersecurity know that don’t have any kind of formal qualifications, but are nevertheless leaders in the nascent field.

It will also stir up debate about the needs of organizations such as the Homeland Security Department , which has said it aims to hire around 1,000 cybersecurity professionals. If it wants that size of a cybersecurity workforce, it may have to become involved in defining just what a cybersecurity professional is. If new Senate legislation becomes law, DHS could become the lead on this issue for the federal government.

And where will the military’s new Cyber Command stand on this? It has its own view on what cybersecurity means, which include offensive as well as defensive capabilities.

Maybe it’s time for another acronym to be thrown into the mix. We already have the CIO, CTO and CSO. Perhaps there should also be a CCSO. No?


Posted by Brian Robinson on Jun 14, 2010 at 7:27 PM

Reader Comments

Thu, Jul 1, 2010 Cyrus

CISSP costs a lot of money to get and maintain. DoD is finding this out the hard way. It is a mandate (DoD 8570.01-M), but most PMs are not placing in into the contracts, or are not enforcing it because they don't have the money to do so. DoD Agencies are having a lot of trouble paying for their people to maintain the CISSPs they have.

If the Feds need a certification, they should design and train their own.

Wed, Jun 23, 2010 DoD IC Alexandria, VA

Interesting. This has been mandated for the DoD Cyber (or InfoSec, or IA, or whatever the flavor of the month is) community for a while now. Have they looked at DoD 8570.01-M.

Wed, Jun 23, 2010 IA security DC

I don't think a CCSO is needed. There is already a federal CISO, Howard Schmidt, even though he doesn't have the actual title. I think he, NIST and OPM need to start a series of meetings to define the cybersecurity job category. That is the first step towards identifying credentialling.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.