By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

Why not more software reuse?

This has been a great week for learning from my students. I just blogged earlier this week about a student discussing risk-taking and short-term government appointments with me. Since then, another student -- who had been a Marine Corps captain and is now a reservist, working in Marine Corps IT -- came by to talk with me about some of the things he was working on, involving faster and better ways to analyze intelligence, before he came to the Kennedy School.

He said a number of interesting things, including a bunch of sources of frustration with paperwork-heavy review processes that clog the arteries of the system and dramatically slow down decision-making. But he said one thing in particular that caught my attention.

He noted that, in private-sector IT development projects he had examined or studied, companies always first asked, when starting a new system, what they could reuse from applications they had already developed. Reuse, he noted, was both a cost saver and a time saver for new project development. By contrast, in his military IT experience, people seldom if ever looked at what could be re-used when starting a new project -- and IT vendors did nothing, he noted, to help the government ask that question or to suggest re-use opportunities.

We talked about this a bit. I made the observation that, unlike the case with a number of other dysfunctional government practices in the IT development arena, there wouldn't appear to be any government-unique regs or requirements driving this behavior -- only cultural, organizational or SOP kinds of problems. My student agreed. If this is the case, incorporating into the culture an automatic look at reuse opportunities might be a low-hanging fruit for IT development improvement.

Having hung around the government IT development management work for a while, I have come across mention of this issue on occasion. I believe it came up at least peripherally in the work of the recent Government Technology Opportunity for the 21st Century commission that I co-chaired with Linda Gooden from Lockheed. But I don't think anything about this got incorporated in our report.

I am raising now this issue in the blog to get reader reactions and comments. Is software reuse in developing new applications something that deserves seriously more attention in the federal IT world? Why or why not? If yes, why aren't we doing this more already, and what can be done to increase attention to this?

To all blog readers -- happy Thanksgiving! I normally am no huge fan of American cuisine -- I am partial to spicy Asian food -- but I really, really love all Thanksgiving fare, so my stomach is already growling before turkey day tomorrow.

Posted on Nov 24, 2010 at 7:26 PM

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.