Lectern

By Steve Kelman

Blog archive

Policymakers in the making focus on U.S.-China relations

 I wrote two years ago about "Spring Exercise" for our first-year master's students at the Harvard Kennedy School. This is the capstone of the students' first year: The entire class -- more than 200 first-year students -- stop all their other academic activities (their required courses end early) to work on the same project for two weeks. During the first week they write an individual memo to a senior decision-maker, and in the second week students, working in groups of five, do a simulated briefing for the decision-maker (played usually by Kennedy School faculty members, although in past years the real decision-maker has often invited the "winning" team to do their briefing for them in person).

Last year's topic was climate change, and this year's -- announced Monday morning (the topic is kept secret until being announced -- is “The Evolving U.S.-China Relationship.” The topic was chosen late last fall by a team of eight Kennedy School faculty members representing the various disciplines (economics, empirical methods, management, politics and ethics) in our master’s core curriculum.

The topic of course reflects both the rise of China and the increase in non-U.S. students at the Kennedy School (along with most other leading American universities). With the increase in international students, and the increasing proportion of the U.S. students who want to work internationally, a purely domestic topic for Spring Exercise has become unacceptable. This year, as well, we have a breakthrough in terms of our speakers/lecturers the first week. With a number of the speakers coming from China, we have more international lecturers than ever before.

Nick Burns, a career foreign service officer who was undersecretary of State between 2005 and 2808 and is now teaching at the Kennedy School, spoke on the first day of overview lectures. He said that he regarded the question of whether the United States and China could have a constructive, peaceful relationship as the most important foreign policy question of the next 50 years -- he meant even more important than terrorism, it would seem. He endorsed the policy of recent administrations of seeking to "engage" China in the world community rather than "containing" it. He argued that the challenge is to get China to contribute to the global common good in areas ranging from nuclear nonproliferation (in Iran and Korea) to human rights violations in Darfur, rather than pursuing a merely "mercantilistic" policy that simply sought to advance China's short-term economic interests.

David Shear, the current deputy assistant secretary of State for East Asia (and also a career public servant), said that U.S. alliances with Japan, Korea, Australia, and Europe give the U.S. an important leverage in seeking China’s cooperation on issues such as Iran and also in preserving the freedom of maneuver of the smaller countries in Asia.

Xie Feng, deputy chief of mission of the Chinese Embassy, began his presentation with a narrative well-known to Chinese but not to most Americans, including our students: China as a five thousand year-old civilization that faced 200 years of humiliation at the hands of the West, that "stood up" under the Communists to regain its national pride under Mao Zedong, and then began in 1978 under Deng Xiaoping to develop its economy. The narrative -- especially the first two parts about the ancient civilization humiliated but now coming back -- underlies many Chinese attitudes towards the West. I should note that one Chinese student told me the diplomat's narrative was something every Chinese has been told so often by the government that it sounded like stale propaganda -- but nonetheless I think it was good for our students to hear it.)

The students will be hearing later from many others, including Yasheng Huang, a Chinese-born MIT economics professor who is very critical of Chinese economic policies, and my colleague Stephen Walt, who believes a U.S.-China clash is inevitable, so the students will hear many views before.... I can't say -- the students don't get the second part of the assignment until Thursday.

Posted on Apr 20, 2010 at 7:26 PM


Reader Comments

Thu, Apr 22, 2010

Thanks Steave's contributions to make more people learn relationships between China and US. Good relationships between two countreis needs understand earch other basicly. I am joining a training program in Harvard. I have asked severl American classmates weather they have visited China. To my surprise, only one has done, but just in Beijing. Most of them do not know much about China. I wish new generation will improve this situation by the efforts of professors, such as Steave.

Wed, Apr 21, 2010 Chun LI

I agree with A.Nan on the point that the researchers need study the history of both US and China, after all the contemporary policies are evolved from history to some degree, which is path dependence. However, the history should be the objective history, which are mostly produced by academics rather than by authority. The history study also need be compared then obtain the truth. No nation is purely beautiful or just ugly.

Wed, Apr 21, 2010 Chun LI Beijing

It’s interesting to know that the topic of this spring exercise at Harvard Kennedy is “The Evolving U.S.-China Relationship”. Actually, I think the issues on US has been put on top agenda in China much earlier than China’s issues are on US’s policy agenda as well as in ordinary people’s after-meal chat. Until now, US’s newly development is always the hottest topic in China; even to some extent, China has set US as an example for national development or at least a very important point of reference. Every time, the telephone dialogue between Hu Jintao and Obama takes the top priority in CCTV Evening News at 7.00 pm, which is the most important nation-run news program in China. Either as partner or as competitor even rival, US and China have paid increasing attention to each other. As to the introduction of China made by Xie Feng, it is the usual propaganda about China’s modern history, particularly referred to the relations between so-called Old China and the West invaders. As far as I am concerned, I accept some points of the narratives but not all, after all, history is much more complicated than the narratives. As to Stephen Walt’s view that a U.S.-China clash is inevitable, to a large extent, I cannot agree with him, because I think nowadays international environment has been being changed a lot, and war or severe clash is not a good way for two powers to solve the problems. Neither US nor China could bear the loss easily.

Wed, Apr 21, 2010 A. Nan

If only some students can do surveys or polls to help their briefing. Look forward to hearing of more updates about this activity from your side.

Wed, Apr 21, 2010 A. Nan

A meaningful activity. I hope this activity does not only bring more discussions on Sino-US relations among all the international students, but also arouse their interests in learning histories of the two countries. Understanding only the importance of Sino-US relations will help little if they want to achieve greatness. The key is buried in history. PS.Start learning from the history WITHOUT bias from the very beginning.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.