WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Industry readies pink slips

Industry leaders didn’t mince any words during a hearing this morning in front of the House Armed Services Committee – pink slips will be going out in October and November if sequestration isn’t stopped.

Lockheed Martin CEO Bob Stevens told the committee that in most states there is a 60-day notice requirement for layoffs because of the federal WARN Act. A few states such as New York require 90-day notice of layoffs.

The notices will be going out on the eve of the 2012 presidential election. The timing isn’t intentional. Sequestration kicks in on Jan. 3 and if you back that up 60 days, it is Nov. 3. The elections are Nov. 6.

Others testifying included David Hess, president of Pratt and Whitney, part of United Technologies Corp., Sean O’Keefe, chairman and CEO of EADS North America, and Della Williams, president of Williams-Pyro, a small defense contractor.

The challenge these executives are facing is the lack of visibility and an abundance of uncertainty. I'm hearing the same thing from a lot of executives, which makes me believe layoffs are not just a threat.

Not that scare tactics aren't being used. O’Keefe said his company has reached out to every member of congress in whose district the company does business, telling them that EADS will warn workers of layoffs if they don’t get guidance on how the government is going to handle the automatic budget cuts.

I'm not sure what impact this had on the committee. The members seemed focused on the idea of pushing out sequestration a year or so, but that’s a weak response from industry’s standpoint.

The committee members’ comments also were mostly jabs at the other party, which puts industry and by extension the American public in the middle as Congress plays a game of brinkmanship.

I guess industry is playing a little brinkmanship of its own by announcing their plans to send layoff notices to hundreds of thousands of employees. There are 123,000 at Lockheed alone. But they also have a fiduciary responsibility to their investors, and investors don’t like surprises, so they don't really have a choice but to announce their plans.

I didn’t hear any of the executives ask that the defense budget not be cut. No, what these executives want is predictability and visibility.

“We are a long cycle company,” Steven said. “Our products last 20, 30 years, and right now we only have six months visibility…Right now there is crushing uncertainty.”

What’s being crushed? Investment in technology and new products; hiring and training workers; and the ability to retain highly skilled workers.

The executives told the committee that a longer term solution is needed, not just a one-year fix.

“A long-term solution would open up the growth that we are looking for,” Stevens said.

It’ll be interesting to see how Congress reacts to the growing threats of layoffs if sequestration becomes a reality.

I’m sure they'll take action but the question is whether it’ll come in time to avoid economic damage.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Jul 18, 2012 at 9:52 AM

Reader Comments

Fri, Jul 20, 2012 Ken WA state

I'm a college student; and boy; can I tell you how much I like aviation; science, and aerospace, including parts of the def. budget. I get really tired of seeing them announce programs that seem ambitious; only to be cut down to size and are underwhelming. In fact, a lot of other budget commitments excluding defense are also extremely underwhelming to me. I'm not talking about money spent on wars. I'm talking equipment.

Thu, Jul 19, 2012 one contractor midwest

Nick, Our customer just asked us what would happen if they had to cut our contract by 20%. Unlike the government, a for profit company cannot operate at a deficit. On our approximately 10 person team that would mean two would lose their jobs. Of course there will be layoffs.

Thu, Jul 19, 2012

Congress should not be paid until this is resolved. That includes any leave time. They need to stay and clean up the mess they are responsible for and be held accountable. If they can't then have them hire smart people that can. It is truely ashame that we don't give them an IQ test before they are allowed to run for office.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


contracts DB