ARMY

20 to fight for $10B in tactical comm tasks

Army awards spots on its Global Tactical Advanced Communication Systems contract

A group of 20 companies have won spots on the Army's $10 billion Global Tactical Advanced Communication Systems contract.

The companies will compete for task orders managed by the Army's Program Executive Office -- Command Communications and Control. The five-year contract will be used by the government to buy a range of tactical communications products, systems and engineer services

The contract is open to a variety of buyers from the Defense, Homeland Security and other departments as well as the military services.

The winners are as follow:

  • CACI Technologies Inc.
  • D & S Consultants Inc.
  • DRS Technical Services Inc.
  • Envistacom LLC
  • General Dynamics One Source LLC
  • Globecomm Systems Inc.
  • Harris Corp.
  • ITT/Exelis Corporation
  • L-3 Services Inc .
  • Lockheed Martin Integrated Systems Inc.
  • Morgan Franklin C3T LLC
  • Nexagen Networks Inc
  • Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation
  • Raytheon Company
  • Rockwell Collins Satellite Communications Systems Inc.
  • Science Applications International Corp.
  • Scientific Research Corporation
  • Telecommunications Systems Inc.
  • Trace Systems Inc.
  • Viasat Inc.

About the Author

Mark Hoover is a senior staff writer with Washington Technology. You can contact him at mhoover@washingtontechnology.com, or connect with him on Twitter at @mhooverWT.

Reader Comments

Fri, Nov 9, 2012

'open to'? After decades of interoprability problems, why is there not a mandatroy DoD/Federal Enterprise solution? Or at least a test process for interoperability all vendors have to pass?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

Featured

WT Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.

Opinion