GAO upholds protest against GSA eGov Travel solicitation

Terms of solicitation judged ambiguous on what was required and what was optional

The Government Accountability Office has upheld a protest against the General Services Administration’s “E-Gov Travel” electronic travel management solicitation because of uncertainty about whether certain objectives were optional or required, the congressional watchdog agency announced.

CWTSatoTravel, also known as CW Government Travel Inc., filed the protest in November 2010 with regard to the GSA’s solicitation for the anticipated E-Gov Travel Service 2.0 contract for end-to-end federal travel management services in a secure, Web-based environment. The contract was to be a continuation of services based on a consolidation of three E-Gov Travel contract awards made in November 2003, including one to CWT.

CWT’s protest challenged several terms of the solicitation, including alleging that the language was vague or ambiguous. GAO sustained that finding and recommended that the solicitation be rewritten and reissued.

“We sustain the protest on the ground that the solicitation is ambiguous about whether the stated objectives are optional or may be requirements for award,” the GAO General Counsel Lynn Gibson wrote in theApril 22 GAO decision.

“We recommend that the agency revise the solicitation to clearly communicate whether the Statement of Work objectives are optional. For example, if the agency intends objectives to be optional, then the solicitation should be amended to eliminate the suggestion that the agency may unilaterally reject an exception taken to an objective,” the decision states.

“On the other hand, if the agency wishes to retain the flexibility of determining, after the receipt of proposals, that an objective will be mandatory rather than optional, then the solicitation should be amended to notify offerors that notwithstanding an exception taken to an objective, an offeror, pursuant to discussions, may be required to offer a technical solution and pricing for one or more of the objectives,” Gibson wrote.

The GAO also stated that CWT’s legal expenses should be reimbursed for the costs covering that portion of its protest. The GAO rejected other aspects of CWT’s protest.

GSA officials were not immediately available to comment.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Fri, Apr 29, 2011

Here is some real low-hanging fruit for Congress to pick as part of budget-cutting. DoD has a travel system up and running. It has warts aplenty, but it works. Why does military and 'everyone else' need 2 seperate travel systems? (Pretty much every civilian-side agency or program or web site or contract has a DoD-side mirror image, but you gotta start somewhere.) Something like a travel and accounting program seems like an obvious canditate to common-service Fed-wide.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
contracts DB


  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More