Contract management becomes top priority for White House

Gordon intends to root out negligent behavior in government acquisition by having agencies better manage the contracts they award

Dan Gordon, administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, issued a stern warning last week to a contracting community that has been too tolerant of poor performance in the past.

“Contract management is front and center—front and center—in our focus,” Gordon said Dec. 10 during a panel discussion on procurement reforms. Gordon and the Obama administration intend to root out negligent behavior in government acquisition by having agencies better manage the contracts they award.


Gordon encourages pioneering in government procurement

SBA suspends 2 firms, alleging they served as fronts

A company will no longer get a contract and then never again hear from the agency about the work, Gordon said. Further the government won’t turn a blind eye toward schemes or well-known shady business partnerships.

“We have got to stop situations where everybody knows that there are sham arrangements going on out there, but no one pays attention. We’re paying attention,” Gordon said.

He was referring to the Small Business Administration’s decision in October to suspend GTSI Corp. for alleged fraud, which, for many people, was one of the biggest news stories of 2010. GTSI was accused of using two small-business prime contractors as a front to funnel itself work and revenue from a contract set aside just for small businesses. GTSI was a subcontractor to the two small businesses on that contract. In November, SBA officials also suspended EG Solutions and MultimaxArray FirstSource, the two small businesses involved. GTSI has since been reinstated as a contractor and the two other companies are still suspended.

“We are taking this seriously, folks,” Gordon said.

Gordon’s push for better contract management after the award is a change from the last decade. Back in the 1990s, officials were analyzing the award process. They were considering how to judge evaluation criteria and past performance history, as well as get a good competition for a contract.

Now though, Gordon said, agencies have to keep tabs on their contracts once they’re awarded. By doing that, agencies should get what they pay for and be able to correct the course if work takes an unintended direction. Gordon said agencies need to pay close attention to the phases where they plan a procurement and define its requirements, but he went so far as to say the post-award management is more important than the planning and the defined requirements.

“The days when no one pays attention to what contractors do after we’ve made the award are over,” Gordon said.

This fundamental shift in focus has become critical because the government is contracting out more services than it is buying products nowadays, said Steve Schooner, a law professor at George Washington University and former associate administrator for procurement law and legislation at OFPP, who was on the panel with Gordon.

“I cannot tell you how important it is to hear the administrator for federal procurement policy talk about the importance of contract management," he said.

Schooner said Gordon’s leadership on better management and more contact between industry and government will be as beneficial to contractors as it is to agencies. Contractors often don’t feel like agency officials can talk with them and that they have no one to call if there’s an issue.

Buying services is much more complex than purchasing products, which further complicates the relationship between the contractor and the agency if two sides don't communicate, he said.

“You wouldn’t have renovations done in your home and not visit the site,” Schooner said.

In the end, management and communication between the two sides will make for a more successful relationship, he said.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Tue, Dec 14, 2010

"GTSI was accused of using two small-business prime contractors as a front to funnel itself work and revenue from a contract set aside just for small businesses""" IT"S NOT JUST GTSI~.. Check out the rest of the Large corporations that are stealing contracts from Small Businesses, and fraudulently labeling themselves as a small business.. Bechtel, Lockheed, Boeing, Rolls Royce.. The list goes on and on. It's nice to see light shed on this matter, but I'll buy into their "It's out main focus" when action is taking against these giant thieves.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More


    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.