ISR technology key to victory in Afghanistan, Cartwright says

Platforms and sensors must be widely deployed, data rapidly disseminated

Nearly a decade of war is taking a major toll on the U.S. military and economy, and combined with complex technological needs, it’s proving to be a tough road for troops in the ongoing Southwest Asia conflict, according to one senior Defense Department official.

“The reality is we are in the ninth year of this war and that tends to be lost on many,” said Marine Corps Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. “We also, as a nation, are at really unprecedented levels of debt. Grand strategy is all about your ability to match resource to need. At some point, we’re dangerously close to not having the resource for the need.”

Part of the problem is the government’s approach to developing and acquiring technologies, according to Cartwright, who spoke Nov. 4 at the GEOINT 2010 Symposium in New Orleans.

“As a nation, we’re basically still in our incentive structures, our governance is locked in an industrial construct and yet we’re an IT world. We haven’t quite figured out how to square that,” he said. “Frankly, it’s easy to get a $50 billion grant for ships, airplanes or spacecraft; it’s impossible to get $1 billion for an IT system. And yet, that’s where our leverage is.”

The chasm between the two acquisition approaches is widened by military culture, he added.

Cartwright also took aim at the current state of key tools of modern warfare: Platforms, sensors and data. He said that better intelligence technology, such as full-motion video and wide-area surveillance, need to be more persistent and fielded more quickly.

“The utility of a still image is not useful on the battlefield,” he said. Instead, service members on the ground and analysts need to be able to understand the “pattern of life” provided by full-motion video.

He also stressed the importance of all data being online and accessible.

“Everything we’re doing today has got to move to digital so that we can store [data], manipulate it, move it to whoever needs it and do it in a timely fashion,” Cartwright said. He expressed frustration with proprietary data standards and formats that hinder information-sharing, which could prevent U.S. forces from keeping up with the enemy.

“This is real. This is not a game. This is important stuff, and making sure that the institution stays aligned and focused on what it is we need to win this fight – what it is we need to give to our soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines so that they walk home – is very near and dear to my heart,” Cartwright said. “This is a lot more than a business case.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Reader Comments

Sat, Nov 6, 2010 Observer

Like many flags, he thinks the American people have written him a blank check. And he seems to think that we are after "victory" in Afghanistan. There is no blank check, and the current president and the next one will continue to cut the defense budget, which remains full of waste. This saves money for what the warfighters really need.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.