What's next for GTSI?

Company likely faces tough road back from suspension

The Small Business Administration put its foot down last week by suspending GTSI Corp. from federal contracting, and experts say it will be hard to get SBA to back down, especially in this political environment.

“This is going to be an uphill battle [for GTSI] because the government has its documents” as proof, and has gone so far as a suspension, said Theodore Watson, a government contracts attorney at Watson and Associates.

GTSI has two options now that SBA decided to block the value-added reseller company from doing new business with the government.

Company executives can bring in lawyers to challenge SBA’s decision and show it did nothing wrong or, at least, that the allegations are a misunderstanding. Or they can plead their case to SBA’s suspension official, in hopes that SBA might lift the suspension.

GTSI executives will have to prove to SBA that it understands the problems, and that they’ve taken care of them. And, as important, they will have to make SBA believe that the same misdeeds won’t happen again, said Larry Allen, president of the Coalition for Government Procurement.

Allen said, however, that GTSI will have to do a lot to convince SBA that it has solved the whole problem, including sacrificing a number of senior managers.

Related stories:

GTSI suspended but vows to fight 

Why GTSI and are others in SBA's crosshairs? 

SBA sent a letter to GTSI Oct. 1, suspending GTSI from getting any new work from the federal government, Allen said.

GTSI is accused by SBA of using small-business prime contractors as a front to funnel work and revenue to GTSI. One of the contracts is the Homeland Security Department's FirstSource indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract, which is set aside only for small businesses. GTSI was a subcontractor to two small businesses on that contract.

Watson said an important issue that goes hand-in-hand with a suspension is a company’s other business.

While the government can’t award work to GTSI, prime contractors can’t do business with it either because GTSI is suspended even from subcontracting. And beyond that, GTSI’s reputation is taking a major blow.

In other situations of punishment, suspensions have lasted from a few days, as when the Environmental Protection Agency suspended IBM in 2008, to several years in other circumstances. Because since nearly all of GTSI's revenue is derived from the federal government, a lengthy suspension could be disasterous for the company.

Two issues seem to put GTSI in a tough position regarding its suspension. The IBM case dealt with a single alleged misstep on a specific procurement, Allen said. However, SBA charges that, in GTSI’s case, employees misrepresented themselves numerous times as working for the small business prime contractors, when they actually worked for GTSI.

“This and other evidence in the administrative record shows an ongoing scheme on the part of GTSI and others to accomplish the improper purposes referenced above,” according to SBA's letter to GTSI notifying it about the suspension

SBA also wrote that it has evidence that GTSI’s prime contractors “had little or no involvement in the performance of the contracts.” GTSI was the subcontractor to at least two small businesses.

As for the political climate, members of Congress have been concerned about small business issues, such as misrepresentations and having actually do the work. Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.), chairwoman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Contracting Oversight Subcommittee, held hearings last year looking at whether Alaska Native Corporations were posing as companies simply passing work through to subcontractors. Other lawmakers have introduced legislation to toughen the rules on pass-through companies.

SBA Administrator Karen Mills has said she would work on these types of small-business problems after the Government Accountability Office found small firms in SBA’s business develop programs simply pass work on to large-business subcontractors.

In addition agencies, such as the Defense Department, have issued rules on companies that do little more than send work to subcontractors.

Allen said those decision represent the overtone of the political environment that GTSI finds itself with the suspension.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Thu, Oct 7, 2010 James

It's about time the the government is starting to crack down on this type of behavior with government contractors. For far too long this has been taking place at the expense of the hard earned tax dollars of the American people. This comes on the heels of some other recent disclosures by the GSA as well as the SBA of investigations taking place on other government integrators and contractors. One such company, Nova Datacom, based out of Chantilly, VA is currently under investigation for defrauding the government on several contracts as well as bribing key COTRs within several government agencies. It will be interesting to see how all of this plays out in the weeks and months to come.

Thu, Oct 7, 2010 Phil DC

It takes two to tango. Going after GTSI and not Eyak mystifies me. Poor little Eyak, if you recall, was trying a hostile takeover just a week ago. And one more thing. Jim Leto was leading GTSI when this happened. He was on GTSI's board and is now on Eyak's board. This goes a lot deeper. The real losers are the 500+ honest trench workers at GTSI facing the loss of a job while the fat cats enjoy a golden parachute. Way to go SBA.

Wed, Oct 6, 2010

Abuses need to be cleaned up, but this is another example of the Government punishing a business for the inappropriate actions/selections of the Government Contracting agency. All members of the winning Team, are usually asked to represent themselves as a Team Member, customarily titled with the name of the Prime Contractor. The business relationship is between the Government and the Prime Contractor -- not subcontractors (even when subcontractor personnel are involved).

Wed, Oct 6, 2010 Sally

To David L: ----- Agreed!!! At least this is a starting point. We can only hope that this opens up a can of worms, and puts the spotlight on the bad boys of federal contracting.... How can us small businesses compete when the market is clearly not designed to support us? (well, it is supposed to be, but they never follow the rules) We cannot compete with these big guys.

Wed, Oct 6, 2010

Where there's a loop-hole - there's a way and they'll find it.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.


contracts DB