Defense budget constraints force hard acquisition decisions

Getting tech tools to the troops means juggling budgets, requirements

As the Defense Department shaves down its budgets, particularly within acquisition, it’s becoming harder to balance costs with the logistics of implementing new technologies, a panel of officials from the Defense Information Systems Agency said last week.

Moving toward enterprisewide solutions is the de facto answer to the question of what’s next for military technology, but it’s complicated by challenges across the life cycle, from design and development to fielding weapons and tools, and the maintenance required in keeping systems running.

“We want to move away from building everything ourselves toward leveraging enterprise and existing services. We can’t invest in things we need because we’re paying for localized maintenance,” said Martin Gross, DISA deputy program executive officer, Command and Control Capabilities.

But making that move requires taking on the inherent obstacles, beginning with the processes and approaches to integrating systems, Gross said at the AFCEA Northern Virginia chapter’s Warfighters Support Agencies IT Day on July 15.

“How do you guarantee functionality when relying on other pieces?” he said. The right answer will involve standardized capabilities in command and control as well as agile development that lends itself to flexible solutions, he added.

Gross also expressed concerns about transition, particularly within sustaining current systems throughout ongoing modernization. “There’s no money to just throw things away,” he said.

To overcome these challenges, DISA is on the lookout for solutions that are interoperable and can be sustained, said Dave Bennett, DISA deputy program executive officer for Global Information Grid enterprise solutions.

It is also necessary to develop a big-picture view that goes beyond single systems or specific problems, the panel said.

Still, the juggling act is most critical when it comes to supplying the troops with necessary technologies. The DOD budget crackdown means DISA and other defense suppliers need to work with the military to determine what’s most important to have.

“We have to prioritize with Joint Forces Command. There has to be trade-offs between modernization, sustainment and operational support,” Gross said. “The only thing we can do is prioritize because there’s no way we can take on everything with the limited resources we have.”

About the Author

Amber Corrin is a former staff writer for FCW and Defense Systems.

Reader Comments

Mon, Jul 26, 2010

Since when has it been more cost effective to have someone else building something for you, make a profit and then pass that cost along to you? This contract it out or acquire it attitude is running our governement budget into the ground. Yes, I believe there are times where contracting a product or service make sense, but in most cases, if the contractor can do it, and make money, we should be able to do it for less. Quit wasting our tax dollars and start managing it and the people under you.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


  • POWER TRAINING: How to engage your customers

    Don't miss our Aug. 2 Washington Technology Power Training session on Mastering Stakeholder Engagement, where you'll learned the critical skills you need to more fully connect with your customers and win more business. Read More


    In our latest Project 38 Podcast, editor Nick Wakeman interviews Tom Romeo, the leader of Maximus Federal about how it has zoomed up the 2019 Top 100. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.