DHS is missing documents on noncompetitive contracts, IG says

Majority of noncompetitive contracts reviewed lacked proper documentation

For the second time in two months, Homeland Security Department Inspector General Richard Skinner has identified a pattern of missing or inadequate documentation for noncompetitive contracting at the department.

The new report, issued today, reviewed 39 DHS noncompetitive contracts valued at $72 million in fiscal 2008. Of the 39 files, 33 had missing or inadequate written justifications, market studies or other documents, the report stated.


Related Story

DHS awarded noncompetitive contracts without having adequate records, IG says


“The procurement files reviewed did not always have sufficient evidence of market research or acquisition planning. Acquisition personnel did not always follow regulations, policies, or procedures to support awarding the contracts through other than full and open competition. As a result, the department cannot ensure that it received the best possible value on the goods and services it acquired from these contracts,” Skinner wrote in the report.

The IG’s previous report, issued March 4, found a similar pattern in noncompetitive contracts for fiscal 2009.

DHS officials agreed with some of the findings and recommendations.

Although the Federal Acquisition Regulation said agencies should strive for competitive contracting, it permits a number of exceptions. In certain cases, written justifications or market research, or both, must be included in the file.

The IG’s audit said that three of the 11 contracts requiring written justifications did not include those justifications in the files. However, DHS officials disagreed with that assessment, and said no justifications were needed for those three contracts.

Of the 39 noncompetitive contracts reviewed, 23 were small business contracts that required market research. Based on the review, the IG said 16 of those contracts did not provide evidence of the research.

The inspector general recommended that the chief procurement officer institute a strengthened oversight process and issue guidance to ensure that documentation is adequate and is added to the files.

DHS officials said they agreed with the recommendations but also said their oversight process was sufficient. “The Chief Procurement Officer agrees that lack of sufficient documentation is an issue for FY 2008 contract files, but believes it has a viable oversight program in place,” the report stated.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.