OFPP proposes tests for deciding when to outsource work

Too much 'inherently governmental' functions going to contractors, proposed policy states

The Obama administration is creating a new test for agencies to use when deciding whether or not to outsource work to contractors.

The proposed guidance is part of the administration's attempt to clarify the definition of what is an “inherently governmental function” and to bring more contractor work in-house.

“There are too many anecdotes that suggest work that is really inherently governmental — work that needs to be reserved for federal employees — is, in fact, being done by contractors,” Daniel Gordon, administrator of Office of Federal Procurement Policy, said in a speech earlier this month.

Related stories:

'Inherently governmental' defies quick definition

Senators press for broader definition of 'inherently governmental'

The OFPP guidance is using a definition from the 1998 Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act.

The term inherently governmental function means a “function that is so intimately related to the public interest as to require performance by federal government employees,” according to the FAIR Act.

The proposed policy letter includes examples of inherently governmental work, such as applying government authority or making value judgments for the government, such monetary transactions. The policy letter also outlines tests agencies can use to determine whether or not it is appropriate to hire a contractor for the work.

“The nature of the function test” would ask agency managers to consider whether the work under consideration would involve exercising the government’s sovereignty. If so, it should be deemed an inherently governmental function.

“The discretion test” would have managers evaluate whether outsourcing the work to a contractor could effectively commit the government to a course of action, according to the policy document.

“It is the policy of the executive branch to ensure that government action is taken as a result of informed, independent judgments made by government officials,” who are bound by law and are accountable to the president, the letter states.

President Barack Obama first addressed this issue in a March 4, 2009, procurement memo, in which he ordered OFPP to clarify when outsourcing is and is not appropriate.

But the issue was not new. Six months earlier, President George W. Bush had signed into law the fiscal 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, which also required OFPP to establish clearer lines between work that a contractor can and cannot do.

President Bill Clinton signed the FAIR Act into law in 1998.

OFPP will accept comments on its proposal through June 1.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Fri, Apr 2, 2010 Brenda Atlanta, GA

Most of the things that the federal government is doing now weren't even ideas when the Constitution was written. That's the reason we have Amendments; our rules and laws need to keep pace with the real world. Do you want a contractor to do all of the testing, evaluation and reports to recommend or determine whether or not some action should be taken, which is then just rubber stamped on through project managers and management staff that will probably cost taxpayers money? Should a non-federal employee or contractor determine who should get grants and contracts? Some things are better handled by contractors; by the same token, there are some things that NEED to be handled by civil service workers. If a good job is not done, don't change from federal employee to contractor; get rid of the non-productive employee and hire someone willing to earn the paycheck that American gives us.

Fri, Apr 2, 2010 Dave

If it's not called for in the Constitution, it's not inherently governmental.

Thu, Apr 1, 2010

You need to proofread your article.

Thu, Apr 1, 2010 JM

The only true "inherently governmental" functions are national defense and the printing of money, at which our government excels. Unfortunately, it's expertise in the latter is undermining everything else. ~ JM

Thu, Apr 1, 2010

Oh please... "There are too many anecdotes that suggest work that is really inherently governmental — work that needs to be reserved for federal employees.." Anecdotes ??? Who do you suppose has his ear in this Administration? Lets see the data - er - supplied by federal employees and their unions, defined by federal employees and their runions, desired by federal employees and their unions. BTW, what is the fastest growing segment of the union movement - Federal and other public unions membership - I wonder why !! Its about the money and where it goes - not quality, competency or cost.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above.


WT Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.