Groups ask court to delay E-Verify despite ruling

Plaintiffs considering appeal to overturn court decision

One of the organizations that attempted to block the mandatory E-Verify rule for federal contractors plans to appeal the recent court decision that upheld the rule, and today filed a motion asking the court to delay implementation of the order.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Maryland ruled against the organizations Aug. 26, upholding the Homeland Security Department’s rule making E-Verify mandatory for federal contractors starting Sept. 8.

The plaintiffs in the lawsuit include the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Associated Builders and Contractors.

“We have a filed an emergency motion for an injunction pending appeal, which is a placeholder, but is considered an appeal since it is part of the appeal process. The attorneys are working on the formal appeal,” said Gerry Fritz, a spokesman for the builders' group.

Separately, the plaintiffs also asked the Justice Department to voluntarily delay, or stay, enforcement of the E-Verify rule beyond the scheduled Sept. 8 date. The Justice Department denied that request today, Fritz said.

E-Verify is a Web-based system that DHS runs in partnership with the Social Security Administration. Employers enter the Social Security numbers of prospective new hires and current employees. The system is intended to verify that the subjects are legally eligible to work in the United States, but the program has been controversial due to errors in the databases involved.

Lawrence Lorber, an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said they have notified the court that if the injunction is granted, the appeal will be filed in 30 days. The goal of the injunction is to avoid the harm that would be caused by beginning enforcement of the rule on Sept. 8, he said.

"There will be irreparable harm to the plaintiffs if the order is not stayed," Lorber said. "You cannot unscramble the egg."

Randy Johnson, senior vice president of labor, immigration and employee benefits at the chamber, said the organization is considering all its options. “We are looking at our chances of winning, and whether we can raise enough money to continue the case,” he said.

About the Author

Alice Lipowicz is a staff writer covering government 2.0, homeland security and other IT policies for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Fri, Sep 11, 2009 femtobeam

The loopholes allow subcontractors to hide slave labor either by paying them less than $100,000 or not listing them at all by claiming them as indirect support personnel. In order to prevent fraud and slavery, all persons involved must be identified and the sources of information and ownership rights must be known by the system. This requires a reversal of PII anonymity practice. Ownership of technology rights are now a cloudy theft conspiracy.

Thu, Sep 3, 2009 R. Baron Arizona

E-Verify may be controversial due to alleged errors in the databases involved, but what large database is ever error free? The goal should be to correct the errors, and there is no better way to accomplish that end than using the database so errors can be identified and corrected. Social Security databases are used for many other purposes besides E-Verify. If errors are allowed to remain unidentified, then they will fester into larger problems that will just be more difficult to correct in the future. E-Verify is not the problem, it is the first step of the solution.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here


contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.