VA's IT officials accused of abuse of authority and ethical breaches

Two reports from the inspector general allege misconduct

The Veterans Affairs Department’s inspector general is claiming that high-ranking officials in the agency's information technology office abused their authority, including improperly influencing the hiring of a contractor.

The allegations include abuse of authority, prohibited personnel practices, improperly administering awards and engaging in nepotism.

The IG's investigations are described in two heavily redacted reports released Aug. 18.

The IG claims that Katherine Adair Martinez, VA’s deputy assistant secretary for information protection and risk management, misused her position, abused her authority and engaged in prohibited personnel practices when she influenced a contractor working for VA and then the VA to hire her friend, Laura Nash.

Martinez also “took advantage of an inappropriate personal relationship” with Robert Howard, the then-assistant secretary for information technology, to move her workplace to Florida even though she spent almost 60 percent of her time at VA’s central office, the report states. The IG also concluded that Martinez failed to provide proper contractor oversight.

Meanwhile, Kathryn Maginnis, associate deputy assistant secretary for IPRM, allegedly abused her authority and engaged in prohibited personnel practices when she improperly hired four people for senior government positions, according to the IG.

The IG recommended that VA take administrative action against Martinez and Maginnis. In a response to a draft of the IG report dated July 30, Roger Baker, the VA’s assistant secretary for IT, agreed. VA issued a statement saying the allegations will be thoroughly investigated.

Meanwhile, Howard, a political appointee who left the agency at the end of the George W. Bush administration, declined to comment.

In a separate report, the IG claimed that Jennifer Duncan, the former executive assistant to Howard, engaged in nepotism and that she abused her authority when she improperly hired an acquaintance and friend at a rate above the minimum rate of pay. The IG also said she used her position for private gain.

In a memo dated Aug. 3, Baker, once again agreed with the IG’s recommendations. This time there were 34 recommendations involving improper use of funds, appointments and training for the IT office’s employees.

Bob Woods, who served as VA’s chief information officer from 1991 to 1994 said the VA is not the kind of place you want to engage in anything that could be misinterpreted. He added that image and appearances are important and that these types of incidents end up hurting the individuals the most, and it's hard not to have sympathy if you know the people involved.

“In any of these very public positions you’re exposed to this kind of scrutiny and people are going to second guess what you did and why,” said Woods, president of Topside Consulting.

About the Author

Ben Bain is a reporter for Federal Computer Week.

Reader Comments

Fri, Aug 21, 2009

Too bad Congress doesn't have to adhere to the same strict guidelines as the Executive branch!

Fri, Aug 21, 2009 Fredricka Ralls

Nepotism is common at VA. The best way to get hired in OI&T? It certainly has nothing to do with veterans status or technical qualifications. They could care less about that. The best way is to be a relative of an SES, GS-15, or GS-14. Roger Baker ought to ask for a list of OI&T employees who have relatives working at VA - and then look closely at the hire date. Adair is not the only one. Start with the 14's and above and he will find a list of sons, daughters, and other immediate family hired in the department - sometimes even working under the same 15 or SES or working conflicted functions - like one relative approving things for another. VA OI&T has long forgotten, if they ever knew, that they are there to serve the veteran. They give that lip service only. And, given the CIO has never heard a shot fired in anger, how likely is that to change. Perhaps, but doubtful, he can change the cancer within OI&T. It starts with eliminating the scumbags, then the B.S.ers, then the incompetents, and finally, the lazy. See who is left and build around them. Our veterans deserve it.

Fri, Aug 21, 2009 Mark B. Virgina

The article states: "Bob Woods, who served as VA’s chief information officer from 1991 to 1994 said the VA is not the kind of place you want to engage in anything that could be misinterpreted". Is Mr. Woods saying that if you are going to do anything, do it at an agency other than the VA? I hope not but it sure looks like that is what he said.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.