GSA considers launching STARS II

The General Services Administration plans to launch a second version of its governmentwide technology contract set aside for small businesses, an agency official said yesterday.

GSA officials agreed in a meeting yesterday that the success of the Streamlined Technology Acquisition Resources for Services (STARS) governmentwide acquisition contract (GWAC) was strong enough to warrant following up with another contract, said Mary Powers-King, GSA’s director of GWACs.

“STARS has been very, very successful and has been well used by our customers,” she said.

As of Nov. 30, 2008, STARS' sales totaled $1.6 billion since 2004, and sales have reached $550 million in 2008, according to GSA.

STARS, which was awarded in 2004, expires in 2011. The agency will begin work this year to develop the proposal for STARS II, she said.

STARS is a small-business set-aside contract offering IT products and services. There are more than 200 companies on STARS, which links those small businesses with agencies needing IT support.

In June 2007, GSA didn't renew the contracts with 197 of the original 416 companies on the GWAC. A clause in the contract required companies to reach $100,000 in sales during the contract’s three base years. If a firm missed that measurement, GSA would not exercise the contract’s option years, which is what happened with those 197 companies, officials said. The majority of companies that lost out on the contract had no sales.

When STARS was introduced, officials said they didn't have the option to write provisions in the contract to allow companies to join or be removed from the contract, known as “on ramps” and “off ramps.” GSA officials would like that option for the next round of STARS.

“We think that’s a good way to go,” Powers-King said.

About the Author

Matthew Weigelt is a freelance journalist who writes about acquisition and procurement.

Reader Comments

Sat, Jan 17, 2009 Kir G. Karouna Washington, DC

The process required for responding to bid invitations is too cumbersome and the nit picking for punctuation or typos seems to be counterproductive. What is the rationale?

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.