FAR Council Suspends Blacklisting Rules Until May 11

The Federal Acquisition Regulation Council March 9 suspended until May 11 so-called blacklisting rules that required federal agencies to consider a host of new criteria in awarding government contracts.

The action was taken "to give agency officials the opportunity for further review and consideration of new regulations," according to the Federal Register.

The FAR Council is "staying implementation of the rule, and apparently opening a FAR case to review the rule as a whole. I think both are important and positive," said Stan Soloway, president of the Professional Services Council, an industry group in Arlington, Va.

The FAR Council issues the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which sets the standards for government procurement. FAR Council members are the General Services Administration, NASA, the Defense Department and the Office of Federal Procurement Policy in the Office of Management and Budget.

The rules required contracting officers to take into account bidders' compliance with labor, tax, employment, antitrust, environmental and consumer protection laws when determining if a company is a responsible business and therefore eligible to win contracts.

The rules, which were opposed by industry and some government agencies, became enforceable Jan. 19, one day before President Bush took office. Supporters, including organized labor, said the rules would protect the government from unscrupulous vendors. Opponents, including information technology industry groups, called them arbitrary and unclear.

The governmentwide delay of the rules temporarily resolves conflicting procurement practices. Several agencies had used a "class deviation" to delay implementation of the rules as they sought clarification and training for contracting officers, while others began using the new rules.

Now all agencies must revert to their regular procedures, which require contracting officers to make sure bidders are not debarred or suspended from federal work, have sufficient resources to perform the work and do not have a record of unsatisfactory performance for reasons within their control.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.