Convergence and New Technologies Change the Landscape

"Quite simply, organizational change is not occurring as rapidly as technology is developing. With different divisions pursuing solutions at their own pace, distributed systems management is on a collision course."

-Saverio Merlo
Boole & Babbage

Convergence and New Technologies Change the Landscape

By John Makulowich

Network management, once a fairly well-defined domain of standard activities, routine chores and maintenance tasks, has been radically transformed.

Traditional technology has yielded way to gigabit Ethernets and announcements by IBM Corp. about super fast token ring. Alongside these advances are the thundering hoofs of Redmond, Wash.-based Microsoft Corp., with its NT servers holding out the promise of reduced maintenance overhead with ZAW (zero administration for networks).

On the outskirts are the continuing moves toward full convergence of data, voice and video communications at the desktop, replete with Internet telephony, messaging and videoconferencing. Then there are the likes of Sprint buying a network service provider and a local area network integrator.

These changes have expanded the range of responsibilities for public sector network managers across a diverse landscape of platforms and processes, from the ilk of Unix through client/servers to extranets.

One reflection of the new network management order is the array of niche products that serve both the narrowest of network operations and the broadest of administrative assignments - from monitoring system traffic in pulsating packets to maintaining system security beyond the fierce firewall.

Another reflection is the range of demands made on systems integrators and vendors servicing the government marketplace, from outsourcing to turnkey support.

One person close to the frantic action is Saverio Merlo, senior vice president of marketing and a 17-year veteran with Boole & Babbage, San Jose, Calif., who has broad experience guiding both North American and European marketing strategies. His company provides enterprise automation solutions for distributed systems management.

"There is no good answer to the question about the current state of network management," declares Merlo. "It lost its identity with the encroachment of other disciplines. The traditional evolution of the network from voice and data to open networks and standards has now come to the point where we have to differentiate between network environments and client/server environments."

Not only has the client/server environment eroded the traditional network, but the cost of managing the network is more expensive now, Merlo says. Part of that cost increase is attributable to the difficulty that individuals and organizations are experiencing in trying to organize the workplace to the new paradigm that technology has molded.

"Quite simply, organizational change is not occurring as rapidly as technology is developing," explains Merlo. "With different divisions pursuing solutions at their own pace, distributed systems management is on a collision course."

The solution, he suggests, is to bridge the departmental gap with technology and systems management - the space in which Boole & Babbage competes. Viewing the overall management of information technology, he segments the corporate workspace into people, processes and tools and the management functions into operations, production and administration.

"Our approach is to deliver an end-to-end solution, to bridge any IT element and bring it under a central point of control," Merlo says. "We focus strictly on the top end of the market, whether industry or government, where big customers confront big problems. Here you find large organizations with thousands and thousands of objects whose businesses will suffer immediately if the network falters."

Currently there is strong demand for turnkey solutions, both implementation and operation, especially in the federal government, he says. The focus on open systems and standards is a plus for customers who are trying to come to grips with the dizzying array of network management issues, Merlo adds. Also good news is the fact that World Wide Web technology, including browser programs, has basically solved the graphical user interface issue, decoupling it from a specific technology or platform.

His own company's flagship product, Command/Post, gives managers a pilot house from which to control fault management, end-to-end availability and automated operations throughout the enterprise. And its MainView product line provides performance management and automation in Multiple Virtual Storage systems.

The view of network management across the industry as well as inside the government, is changing almost as rapidly as the network's product life cycles, which in some cases have gone from two to three years to six months.

One of the clearer statements of the transformation shows up in the recently published report, "Information Systems Trustworthiness: Interim Report," issued by the National Research Council's Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board, Committee on Information Systems Trustworthiness.

"Our nation's infrastructures are undergoing profound change," the report notes. "Networked information systems are becoming critical to the daily operation of increasingly large segments of government, industry, and commerce. Moreover, in responding to the needs of subscribers, critical infrastructures like the electric power utilities and public switched telephone network are increasing their dependence on computers and communications networks.

"But this growing dependence on networked computers is accompanied by increased risk. In short, our nation's infrastructures could well evolve into an interdependent system of fragile and vulnerable subsystems. Understanding how to ensure that they will operate reliably is thus vital."

This message is not lost on Stephen M. Cohen, a computer specialist with the U.S. Department of Labor's Employment Standards Administration, the home of four major program offices: Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs; Office of Labor-Management Standards; Office of Workers' Compensation Programs; and Wage and Hour Division.

Ahead of the curve of many of his colleagues, Cohen returned to school for an MBA after getting his undergraduate degree in information science. His approach to network issues reflects that decision.

"I consider where I work not just an [information systems] department anymore; it's now a department that solves business problems. More and more, IT staff will be called upon to serve as business consultants offering guidance in applying appropriate technology to help the organization maintain its competitive edge. To help staff make decisions, you will need to focus the standard business school mind-set on organizational mission, strategy and direction," says Cohen.

"You can see how far we've progressed in just this decade. The basic end user today can almost perform the functionality of an IS department, building his own applications and database and making ad hoc queries."

More and more, network management is becoming an issue of keeping up with user requirements, which change almost daily, as well as monitoring the increased use of the network, including the Internet, for example, to present content and graphics to target audiences. It's all part of extending reach and expanding services to ever-demanding customers.

The advent of HTML (hypertext markup language) and the desire to publish along with developments in Java, applications, imaging technology and multimedia tools, such as VRML (virtual reality modeling language for 3-D), should keep user demand of the network on a continuing growth curve.

Cohen echoes the comments of Boole & Babbage's Merlo with his own observation that the push had been to distributed computing with "servers all over the place." He sees that changing, with a new thrust more toward centralization with greater demand placed on network reliability. In fact, Cohen notes that additional redundant lines had to be installed in his division to support the increase in wide area network traffic.

"Clearly, there's more demand on the network, which makes sense from an administrative standpoint. However, there is chaos on the server end. We are now in the process of cleaning that up," says Cohen.

Asked about the software he's using for network management tasks, he cites as one example FireWall-1 from Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Redwood City, Calif., an enterprise security solution that integrates access control, authentication, encryption, network address translation, content security, auditing and connection control.

"We purchased it to address Internet security issues and are pleased with it. Among the key features for us were how easy it was to deploy and that it really provides good information about what's going on with our interface to the Internet," says Cohen.

Still, with all the hardware, middleware and software available, he feels that network management and the present crop of tools are basically in a state of chaos, demanding continuing re-evaluation of products.

"You could end up with five, six, seven packages depending on what devices you are monitoring, whether concentrators, routers, bridges, whatever," admits Cohen.

One product that's caught his eye and which he plans to evaluate soon is the Spectrum Enterprise Manager, an integrated systems and network management platform, from Cabletron Systems of Rochester, N.H. Promising not only to reduce network downtime and associated costs, but to simplify and distribute network operations throughout the organization, the product offers a client/server architecture with different levels of scalability and flexibility. It also allows, according to company literature, everyone from the manager of information services to less-technical, high-level executives to have the tools to run a network in line with the goals of the business.

A different viewpoint of network management is offered by Jay Sriram, a senior systems administrator and database administrator for a division of the U.S. Department of Education. Experienced in both the mainframe and client/server environments, he admits that the changes brought about by distributed computing and increased end-user activity have not been wholeheartedly accepted by all.

"As you might expect, the transformation has been painful for some. Many users are really happy that they can do more. On the other hand, there are those who don't want to do a lot of computing and prefer the old dumb-terminal technology," says Sriram.

His role in the Education Department is unique in that he is responsible for an entire isolated system that he helped develop and which he now operates.

"Running on a Hewlett-Packard machine, the system contains the latest data on post-secondary education for which we are totally accountable. That data includes institutional information from school business offices, for example, the name of the school, when it was started, when accredited, its default rate for loans. Covered are barber shop schools, for instance. It's all public domain data and owned by the business end of the Education Department. We are simply the custodians of the data, responsible, for example, for keeping it up to speed with upgrades. It's a turnkey operation, the first type on this scale," says Sriram.

As he points out, this effort originated from soul-searching about why the department was doing everything on the mainframe when users were demanding to share data. One reason the issue was even raised is explained by how quickly client tools have evolved, according to Sriram. "It has made it easier for someone to say they need this kind of facility for this kind of system."

What he installed was Unicenter TNG (The Next Generation) from Computer Associates International Inc. of Islandia, N.Y., which had all the modules that Sriram wanted. The suite offers enterprise management solutions through a set of functions built on an object-oriented architecture and a scalable manager/agent infrastructure operating across heterogeneous networks. It integrates the management of systems, networks, databases and applications and provides a view of this environment.

For example, according to company literature, a management function in Unicenter TNG, such as performance covers network devices and networks as a whole, systems and databases running on them, client/server applications and Internet applications. The integration permits a picture of the performance of all the IT resources involved in a business process.

While he intended to use it on multiple nodes, Sriram wound up hosting it on the single system.

He feels that hindsight has improved the quality of the data. That is, that the information dissemination facilitated by the system has helped better inform users how to tailor their demands. That's been made possible by a new breed of user. Previously solely business analysts, they are now much more computer literate, for example, able to perform ad hoc queries from their system. This has led in many cases to improved quality in their work.

"There is no question that all these developments have raised the level of expectations among users. Many would now like to see increased interactivity, with information returned after they supply input via forms. And many are now offering their input on how the forms should be designed," says Sriram.

With all this change, he admits it is hard to say where the network system will evolve. With broad experience in different environments, he remains philosophical about the future direction.

"There is no right way or wrong way to set up a system to manage information. I don't think it will go in one direction. You just have to align yourself with the technology current at that time. In my experience, every time you centralize or decentralize operations, you have to replace technology to modernize. What's clear is that the online systems have changed the ways that people think about how they can do business. Now different parties to a transaction can call an 800 number and see that a payment has been taken care of," says Sriram.

A third perspective of network management from inside the public sector comes from Ken Wong, an electronics engineer who functions as a network engineer in the National Institutes of Health's Network Systems Branch in the Division of Computer Research and Technology. His role is to help design and maintain the NIH backbone, the high-speed network connection.

Seeking finer granularity for network management - that is, an in-depth look at how traffic was flowing, what hosts were running and what protocols were operating - Wong started using RMON (remote monitoring) products last December from NetScout Systems Inc. of Chelmsford, Mass. One of the key features for him was the clear presentation of the data through a specialized management software program that is highly graphical.

For example, NetScout Expert Visualizer presents a customizable three-dimensional view of the network. Alongside physical views, it offers logical views for traffic, for internetworking and for applications.

The NetScout Manager software provides over 40 integrated diagnostic and analysis tools, letting users view the enterprisewide traffic on any network segment at the physical, protocol or application level. It displays alarms for problem conditions, analyzes the data for troubleshooting, produces reports for policy compliance and generates reports for long-range planning.

The tools also allow network managers to try and offer the maximum quality of service, which means the availability and reliability of distributed client/server applications.

Users are able to view business-critical LAN/WAN segments without regard to protocol or topology; supported are switched LANs, VLANs, frame relay, T1/T3, Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, FDDI (fiber distributed data interface) and token ring. Ethernet is a baseband LAN specification invented by Xerox Corp. and developed jointly by Xerox, Intel and Digital Equipment Corp. Token ring is a token-passing LAN developed and supported by IBM.

While pleased with the product, Wong quickly adds that the limitation of monitoring the backbone is the enormous amount of data that is collected. He repeats the now familiar refrain about the status of network management.

"Network management is in chaos. There is just so much information about the network you can collect. Over time, with so much data coming at you, you tend to become desensitized to key parameters that are important to collect. There's also too much information to sort through," says Wong.

One solution, he suggests, is to have network managers protected from this flood of data and only notified when there is important information on the network. This is a function that RMON should be able to perform.

Even so, he finds the software valuable, both to answer questions that occur from rising expectations about network performance and to reduce costs. For instance, he often receives complaints that the network is slow. With RMON, he can put instrumentation on the network to see why it is slow.

"Here's a good example. Several months ago, an end user was saying the network was slow. He proposed a solution that would have cost about $250,000. I told him, 'Let's take a look at it.' I put NetScout probes on the network to monitor performance. We saw lots of intranet traffic, where the traffic was going and what was generating it. After that, we recommended an Ethernet switch for $25,000 and it solved the problem. Admittedly, it's not perfect data, but it offers excellent clues about how to spend money and upgrade the network," says Wong.

The popular RMON market is served by a number of companies, among them SolCom Systems Inc. of Livingston, Scotland, which has a suite of network management products for managers of Ethernet, token ring and FDDI LANs. Their SNMP/RMON standards-based products support all 20 groups of RMON (1 and 2). As enhancements to current versions, the company plans to release an updated Automatic Data Gatherer and a Web-based interface with expanded reporting capabilities including both RMON and RMON2 reports. Probes for frame relay and asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) will be introduced later this year.

Another company with an enterprisewide network management solution is Tivoli Systems of Austin, Texas, part of IBM Corp. The company offers an open, end-to-end management solution from mainframes to the desktop with network and systems management in between. This month the firm introduced TME 10 LAN Access, which it claims is the first product to manage disparate work group environments from an enterprise level.

According to Tivoli literature, TME 10 LAN Access lets customers manage enterprise desktops directly from the TME 10 console. LAN management solutions now supported by TME 10 LAN Access include Intel LANDesk Management Suite, Microsoft Systems Management Server and IBM NetFinity. The product is also the first implementation of the Multi-Platform Manager Application Programming Interface, the initiative announced by Tivoli and Intel in September 1996 to establish integration between work group and enterprise management solutions.


Caravelle photo

Corien Greenwood, vice president of marketing for Caravelle

In a different category, an up-and-coming network management monitoring tool trying to fill the carefully refined niche of World Wide Web servers is WebWatcher from Caravelle of Nepean, Ontario. Soon to be released in a new version 5.0, the Java-based product monitors your Web site and issues an alert on-screen, by e-mail or alphanumeric pager when it detects an impending problem or real-time failure. It offers visual network mapping and a browser-enabled HTML user interface and tests all TCP/IP hardware and software devices, including http and ftp servers, server hardware, routers and individual Web pages.

According to Corien Greenwood, vice president of marketing for Caravelle, the product targets webmasters dissatisfied with current offerings in the ENMS (enterprise network management systems) market who want to monitor individual PCs on the network. For that reason, WebWatcher is built to perform full SNMP (simple network management protocol) queries on SNMP devices, including setting and receiving trap messages.

"When WebWatcher first hit the market, there were no competing products. In fact, it was one of the first push products on the market announced at Comdex two years ago, the same time as Pointcast. Unlike Pointcast, we don't follow the model of a volume market funded by advertising. With the new release of the product, it can now function as an SNMP device within an ENMS. The ENMS can query WebWatcher 5.0 for the values of both SNMP and non-SNMP devices. One central WebWatcher console can monitor other copies of WebWatcher for exceeded threshold values, sending an SNMP trap to the ENMS for full centralized management," explains Greenwood.

In the midst of this network management activity, plugging away at what it terms the fringes of enterprise computing, is computer stalwart Unisys of Blue Bell, Pa. The company that boasts over 50,000 customers in more than 100 companies is focused on fusing telecommunications and data communications technologies with its Unisys Network Application Platform/VoiceSource product line. That offering merges Computer Telephony Integration technologies, telephone networks and computers into a single business information system - one likely to create new challenges for network and system administrators.

At the other end of the network management spectrum is a range of products catering to companies that sprouted from the Telecommunications Act of 1996, such as competitive local exchange carriers, better known as CLECs. Meeting their needs are companies like Ace*Comm of Gaithersburg, Md., which has been around since the early 1980s.

"Our products fall under back office systems or operation support systems of which network management is a part," says George T. Jimenez, chief executive of Ace*Comm. "They can help network operators that use SNMP on the enterprise side. This consists of large corporations, universities, really any organization with networks that span more than one location and that has multiple aspects, such as telephone and data."

Not only does his company serve the traditional regional telephone companies, but it also sells to the new phone carriers created by the 1996 act as well as carriers worldwide. According to Jimenez, the CLECs have already collectively submitted nearly 400 applications for new carriers to provide competitive services to the traditional carriers. And Ace*Comm's international business is growing with more than 70 percent of their annual revenue generated beyond the borders of the United States.

Among its carrier products is DCMS, which collects call record data from switches and sends it to a central site where different analyses can be performed, such as billing, fraud detection and traffic. A version of DCMS called NEDS provides real-time data collection, gathering data at the same time from several network elements.

The company's core enterprise product is NetPlus, which is made up of multiple client/server systems that automate such management functions as fault, configuration, accounting, performance and security. The product can scale to support networks which range in size from 1,000 to 5,000 users.

Part of the cause of the current chaos in network management falls at the feet of the federal government, in the opinion of David Steinberg, director of federal systems for Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., a company that commands a 44 percent share of the firewall market for networks.

"Sure, there are lots of security solutions for network managers. Yet, many end users don't know how to evaluate all the variables. The biggest problem for federal users today is evaluating their needs and vendor solutions in a vacuum of government standards. It's become a hot potato between the National Security Agency and NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology," says Steinberg.

He points to NSA's MISSI (Multilevel Information Systems Security Initiative) Program (http://www.nsa.gov:8080/programs/missi/), which he claims was setting the stage for the development of a network security standard that NSA was to test. Now, he says, NIST is going to pick it up and perform the firewall evaluation.

According to the NSA Web site, MISSI is a network security initiative to provide a framework for interoperable, complementary security products for networked information systems across the Defense Information Infrastructure and the National Information Infrastructure. The MISSI building blocks are based on common security protocols and standards. Flexible solutions are tailored from these building blocks to meet a system's security requirements.

"With this situation, government end users are now in the awkward position of feeling unsure about what levels of security they need to pass the levels of data that they do. That's because almost every agency has levels of classification," says Steinberg.

What's his proposed solution? He tells customers to pretend they are commercial firms and to remember that having some protection is better than none. He suggests this because he knows that staff are implementing security standards but doing it without government guidance.

With over 130 Internet protocols, each presenting its own challenges, the network manager faces a daunting task to establish a secure network. Steinberg suggests that at the core level, you need an internal firewall. Next, you need to protect data passing over the Internet with an encryption scheme. The third line of defense is an authentication scheme with a password and secure ID.

"If you implement these three things, you are ahead," advises Steinberg. "Crackers are like burglars. Seeing these levels, they are likely to move on. Besides, if you don't implement a solution, you can drive yourself nuts by worrying. Why be more vulnerable?"


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.