Keep AT&ampT From Becoming a Monopoly, Again

Reducing the Justice Department's role in overseeing AT&ampT is a bad idea

P> Late last month the Department of Justice formally transferred authority for enforcing antitrust laws to the Federal Communications Commission. Let's put aside for now the FCC's staffing and budget problems, which in and of themselves raise serious questions about the agency's ability to handle a matter of such enormous complexity.

There is a larger issue at stake: Who is the biggest antitrust threat in this hypernetworked, information superhighway economy? How should that threat be examined and mitigated?

This is an old problem. For decades, IBM was the focus of Department of Justice antitrust lawyers. So, too, was AT&T and the Baby Bells spawned by Ma Bell's breakup. More recently, the Justice Department has cracked down on Microsoft.

But the stakes are higher now precisely because the convergence of computers and telecommunications is becoming a reality.

Telecom reform has forced the Justice Department to give up many decades of research and continuing investigation. The assumption is that AT&T is no longer the threat it once was. This is wrong and wasteful. Sooner or later regulators will have to duplicate that research at taxpayer expense once the true nature of the AT&T threat becomes apparent. By that time, it may be too late.

Competition alone cannot guarantee the interests of consumers and small businessmen who are the backbone of this nation -- that's why antitrust lawyers exist. No other company has AT&T's financial resources, its international network links, its broad technical expertise, its brand-name recognition -- in a word, its ubiquity.

Consider this excerpt from our cover story: "For one year, AT&T will give its phone customers five hours of Internet access a month through the dial-up service AT&T WorldNet -- free. People who go over that time limit, and businesses, would be charged more, as would non-AT&T customers who would now have an incentive to switch phone companies. AT&T business customers can get unlimited monthly service at $19.95 a month.

"If that doesn't draw in the reluctant surfer, this might: AT&T is also claiming responsibility to the dollar for any credit card theft while using its Internet service and the AT&T Universal Card. The service will be available via 200 locations to 80 percent of the country on March 14."

Who, but AT&T, could sustain that kind of loss leader in exchange for market share? No one -- not even Microsoft.

The Internet has spawned the greatest wave of entrepreneurship since the invention of the PC. Hundreds of small Internet service providers have emerged around the nation -- and most are clustered around the Beltway, the home of the Internet.

If regulators ignore AT&T, they do so at the risk of destroying the single most potent source of innovation and entrepreneurship in the nation today.


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Our databases track awards back to 2013. Read More

  • Navigating the trends and issues of 2016 Nick Wakeman

    In our latest WT Insider Report, we pull together our best advice, insights and reporting on the trends and issues that will shape the market in 2016 and beyond. Read More

contracts DB

Washington Technology Daily

Sign up for our newsletter.

Terms and Privacy Policy consent

I agree to this site's Privacy Policy.