Clinton Stumbles With Intellectual Property Guidelines

The Clinton administration has kindled a firestorm of controversy after issuing a draft document it calls "Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure" -- a blueprint for dealing with the many thorny intellectual property issues raised in the digital age.

The Clinton administration has kindled a firestorm of controversy after issuing a draft document it calls "Intellectual Property and the National Information Infrastructure" -- a blueprint for dealing with the many thorny intellectual property issues raised in the digital age.

By self-proclamation it is billed as a merely modest amendment to the existing body of law governing intellectual property. But judging by the voluminous responses -- nearly 150 organizations officially filed comments on the draft -- the document has touched a nerve across a broad range of organizations. "[The report] is incredibly wrong-headed," said Mike Godwin, online counsel at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Libraries say the document endangers sacred principles of public access to information; online services such as America Online and Prodigy fear certain provisions could very well put them out of business; and many lawyers argue the document treats everyone as a potential information pirate, thus tossing aside the principle that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

Essentially, the document's many proposals appear to add up to much-enhanced enforcement rights for copyright, with a major emphasis on sticks rather than carrots to deter would-be pirates. Online services, for instance, would be held responsible for illegal downloading of software by their members -- even if they don't know it is occurring.

If there are clear winners, they are the world's largest holders of copyrights: Hollywood movie studios, large publishing houses, Microsoft Corp. One provision would outlaw devices built to circumvent anti-copying mechanisms such as those that prevent audio digital tapes from being recorded.

Conversely, the document appears to make a frontal assault on the budding culture of the Internet and hackers, which argue for the widest and cheapest possible distribution of information.

The report focuses mostly on copyright, rather than the three other pillars of intellectual property: trademarks, patents and trade secrets. Copyright, as opposed to patents, is concerned with the expression of an idea rather than the idea itself.

So did the Clinton administration sell out to established financial interests in updating copyright law for cyberspace? The oft-quoted Godwin argues it has. But that answer may be too pat -- and it could trivialize the huge interests at stake.

Copyright industries account for more than 5 percent of the nation's GDP and nearly five percent of total employment. And those industries created jobs at a faster rate than any other similar-sized area of the economy.

So though money may have spoken in the document's creation, so too did one of the nation's most important sources of jobs and national wealth.

Then there is the technological challenge to more than two centuries of jurisprudential tradition. The copyright law, beginning in 1790, has gradually been modified to cover maps, charts, engravings, etchings, musical compositions, paintings, photographs, motion pictures, audio recordings and, most recently, computer programs. For copyright holders, and their lawyers, the key challenge today is this: Every computer is a copying machine, and the copies it makes of a digitized book, song or movie are completely identical to the original. So whereas only the richest and biggest organizations could afford printing presses in the past -- at least ones capable of quality reproduction -- one can now be had for a couple thousand dollars.

This is a tectonic shift. Previously, the expense of producing, compiling and distributing information served as a de facto copyright enforcement mechanism. So as a practical matter, most people couldn't steal copyrighted information in ways capable of really affecting profits and revenues of major publishers, movie studios, etc. And those that did -- by making analog tape recordings from analog records, for instance -- ended up with copies inferior to the "master" recording.

Now everyone has their own copying machine, a kind of universal replicator capable of turning identical copies of any information into the ones and zeros of computer language. Civil libertarians, hackers and anarchists have touted this development as the dawning of a new age of empowerment. In publications such as Wired and in news groups splayed across the Internet, the digerati have proclaimed the emergence of information as a true commodity -- even something free.

One of the problems is that copyright attempts to balance often incompatible interests, those of intellectual property holders and the general public. The latter's rights are embodied in the presumption of free information dissemination in the First Amendment and the intellectual property clause of the Constitution -- Article I, Section 8. Depending on whose lawyer you talk to, copyright either comes down on the side of owners or users -- but rarely does it strike a perfect balance.

It is within this context the Clinton administration issued its draft in defense of copyright, traditionally defined but outfitted with some new clothing to weather the oncoming digital storm. Among the more controversial points:

- The document restricts the "fair use" doctrine, which allowed limited copying of copyrighted materials for research and education.

-It also proposes to do away with the idea of "first sale" for electronic information. This concept allows a purchaser of a record or book, for instance, to resell that product, in effect, eliminating a copyright owner's control over secondary markets. But in cyberspace copyright owners would have a monopoly over primary and secondary sales; a copy of a digital work is as good as owning unlimited number of copies because a computer is, in essence, a universal printing press.

-The draft would also ban all devices that defeat copy protection. Some have pointed out that manufacturers of scanners would be in violation of this provision.

- Any act of transmission is defined as a publication of a work. Among other things, copyright law requires mandatory deposit of published information in the Library of Congress. The new definition of publication would create mountains of unmanageable filings, not to mention unwieldy and expensive burdens on electronic publishers and online services.

"The minor changes...would amount to a radical recalibration of the intellectual property balance," claims Jessica Litman, professor of communications at Wayne State University, in comments to the administration.

Still, as many have pointed out, copyright may be unenforceable -- a floating stick in a whirling, digital vortex. Traditionally, copyright goes to something in a tangible, fixed medium -- a vinyl disc, a bound collection of papers, a photographic negative. This allowed copyright owners to track the fate of their copyrighted material. But now the information-housing medium can be variable and ethereal -- floppy disk, an Internet server, an online bulletin board service. And new technology allows users to shift information from one medium to another, in effect, freeing information from the shackles of its physical cell. That begs the conclusion : If there is no medium to protect, there is no copyright. "New information technology will destroy copyright as we know it," argues Victor Rosenberg, an associate professor in library science at the University of Michigan, in comments on the document. "It is imperative for publishers to begin to explore alternative sources of revenue and alternative means of protecting their resources."

This is particularly true given the increasingly global and non-territorial nature of commerce. Information highways don't respect national boundaries, and the information exchange that occurs on them will often be subject to non-American views of copyright. In this climate, a Chinese or Russian view of copyright -- which is essentially nonexistent -- may prevail. After all, the United States has the most potential revenue to lose, as it is the center of the three owners of the most valuable copyright industries on earth: the software, entertainment and publishing industries. So these countries have little incentive -- and few practical barriers -- to ripping off anything they please. And the U.S. has everything to lose. "Just as there are numbered bank accounts in financial havens like the Cayman Islands, there will be data havens where unscrupulous entrepreneurs will steal data and repackage it for commercial distribution," writes the University of Michigan's Rosenberg.

Still, there may be at least a partial technological fix for copyright protection -- encryption technology, for instance. And there have been precedents for effectively preventing manufacturers from introducing threatening new technology to the marketplace. Digital audio tape recorders, at the behest of the music industry, have been effectively neutered through mandatory inclusion of anti-copying protections in machines.

But in the final analysis, no one is quite sure what lies in store for the copyright system -- or for the public and private interests that benefit from it. There is an old saw that it's alright to rob Peter to pay Paul -- if you're Paul. In the gathering storm of debate over Clinton's proposed revamp to the nation's intellectual property system, many are unsure who gets to be Paul.


X
This website uses cookies to enhance user experience and to analyze performance and traffic on our website. We also share information about your use of our site with our social media, advertising and analytics partners. Learn More / Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Accept Cookies
X
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

When you visit our website, we store cookies on your browser to collect information. The information collected might relate to you, your preferences or your device, and is mostly used to make the site work as you expect it to and to provide a more personalized web experience. However, you can choose not to allow certain types of cookies, which may impact your experience of the site and the services we are able to offer. Click on the different category headings to find out more and change our default settings according to your preference. You cannot opt-out of our First Party Strictly Necessary Cookies as they are deployed in order to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting the cookie banner and remembering your settings, to log into your account, to redirect you when you log out, etc.). For more information about the First and Third Party Cookies used please follow this link.

Allow All Cookies

Manage Consent Preferences

Strictly Necessary Cookies - Always Active

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data, Targeting & Social Media Cookies

Under the California Consumer Privacy Act, you have the right to opt-out of the sale of your personal information to third parties. These cookies collect information for analytics and to personalize your experience with targeted ads. You may exercise your right to opt out of the sale of personal information by using this toggle switch. If you opt out we will not be able to offer you personalised ads and will not hand over your personal information to any third parties. Additionally, you may contact our legal department for further clarification about your rights as a California consumer by using this Exercise My Rights link

If you have enabled privacy controls on your browser (such as a plugin), we have to take that as a valid request to opt-out. Therefore we would not be able to track your activity through the web. This may affect our ability to personalize ads according to your preferences.

Targeting cookies may be set through our site by our advertising partners. They may be used by those companies to build a profile of your interests and show you relevant adverts on other sites. They do not store directly personal information, but are based on uniquely identifying your browser and internet device. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

Social media cookies are set by a range of social media services that we have added to the site to enable you to share our content with your friends and networks. They are capable of tracking your browser across other sites and building up a profile of your interests. This may impact the content and messages you see on other websites you visit. If you do not allow these cookies you may not be able to use or see these sharing tools.

If you want to opt out of all of our lead reports and lists, please submit a privacy request at our Do Not Sell page.

Save Settings
Cookie Preferences Cookie List

Cookie List

A cookie is a small piece of data (text file) that a website – when visited by a user – asks your browser to store on your device in order to remember information about you, such as your language preference or login information. Those cookies are set by us and called first-party cookies. We also use third-party cookies – which are cookies from a domain different than the domain of the website you are visiting – for our advertising and marketing efforts. More specifically, we use cookies and other tracking technologies for the following purposes:

Strictly Necessary Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Functional Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Performance Cookies

We do not allow you to opt-out of our certain cookies, as they are necessary to ensure the proper functioning of our website (such as prompting our cookie banner and remembering your privacy choices) and/or to monitor site performance. These cookies are not used in a way that constitutes a “sale” of your data under the CCPA. You can set your browser to block or alert you about these cookies, but some parts of the site will not work as intended if you do so. You can usually find these settings in the Options or Preferences menu of your browser. Visit www.allaboutcookies.org to learn more.

Sale of Personal Data

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Social Media Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.

Targeting Cookies

We also use cookies to personalize your experience on our websites, including by determining the most relevant content and advertisements to show you, and to monitor site traffic and performance, so that we may improve our websites and your experience. You may opt out of our use of such cookies (and the associated “sale” of your Personal Information) by using this toggle switch. You will still see some advertising, regardless of your selection. Because we do not track you across different devices, browsers and GEMG properties, your selection will take effect only on this browser, this device and this website.