WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Air Force tries again with NetCents 2 Product awards

Maybe the third time will be the charm for the Air Force as it makes its another attempt to award its $6.9 billion NetCents 2 Products contract.

Twice before the Air Force has made awards and twice the service has pulled back on the procurement after being flooded with bid protests.

Now they have made awards to 16 companies, which is the most obvious difference between this attempt at contract awards versus the first and second attempt.

When the Air Force made its first awards in 2012, it named nine winners. For round two in April, eight companies were picked.

For round three, the Air Force considered 26 bidders, so there is definitely room for more protests, especially when you consider some of the companies who didn’t get picked for round three, most notably Dell Federal, Harris IT Services, Sterling Computers Corp., Insight Public Sector and Presidio Networked Solutions. All of those companies filed protests following round 2 when they also didn’t get picked.

For round three, the Air Force kept all of the round two winners and added eight more companies to the mix.

So, finally, you are probably wondering who did win.

The eight companies who won round two in April and are still on the contract are:

  • Ace Technology Partners LLC, Arlington Heights, Ill.
  • CDW Government LLC, Vernon Hills, Ill.
  • CounterTrade Products Inc., Arvada, Colo.
  • FedStore Corp., Rockville, Md.
  • General Dynamics Corp., Falls Church, Va.
  • Intelligent Decisions Inc., Ashburn, Va.
  • Iron Bow Technologies LLC, Chantilly, Va.
  • World Wide Technology, Inc., Maryland Heights, Mo. 

The eight new contractors added on Monday:

  • Blue Tech, Inc., San Diego
  • Global Technology Resources Inc., Denver
  • immix Technology Inc., McLean, Va.
  • Integration Technologies Group, Falls Church, Va.
  • M2 Technology, San Antonio
  • MicroTech, Vienna, Va.
  • Red River Computer Co., Claremont, N.H.
  • Unicom Government Inc., Herndon, Va. (formerly GTSI)

After the second round of protests, the Air Force told the Government Accountability Office that it would reevaluate technical proposals for Trade Agreement Act compliance. The act regulates source countries for IT components. This is important cyber security and counterfeit part issues.

The Air Force also told GAO that it would amend the solicitation, hold limited discussions with bidders, issue another RFP and make new awards.

However, according to the Air Force announcement on Monday, the service said, “During the reevaluation of the technical proposals, it became apparent that it was not necessary to amend the solicitation, hold discussions or issue another request for final proposals.”

The eight new winners in round three received awards based on the last proposals they submitted before the awards back in April, the Air Force said.

As I said, I doubt this is a bullet proof solution with 10 losing bidders out there. They’ll be getting their debriefs in the next week or so and then they have 10 days for filing protests. We should know by mid-to-late September if there will be more trouble for the Air Force.

I’m sure a big question at the debriefs will be, “How was my Trade Agreement Act compliance faulty?”

This might be going out on a limb, but when I look at who didn’t get awards, I don’t think it has anything to do with the Trade Agreement Act. Could it be that they just picked the next eight companies with the lowest prices?

If that’s the case, the Air Force should say so. Because right now it comes across that the losing bidders were not compliant with the Trade Agreements Act, and I’m skeptical of that.

But if there are no protests, the Air Force said the six-year, $6.9 billion contract for commercial IT products and related services will be available for orders in October.

We’ll see.

 

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Aug 26, 2013 at 3:40 PM


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!