WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Clock ticking on NGEN protest

Harris Corp. and Computer Sciences Corp. had their debrief this week, so the clocking is ticking on whether or not they will file a  protest over the loss of the $3.5 billion Navy Next Generation Enterprise Network contract.

The follow-on to the Navy-Marines Corps Intranet contract was won by the incumbent Hewlett-Packard Co. at the end of June.

Neither company is commenting on a protest, but sources indicate that the Harris-CSC team was debriefed by the Navy on July 10. The date of the debrief is critical because it kicks off a 10-day period during which a protest can be filed.

But Harris and CSC have a little extra time because a July 10 debrief makes the tenth day July 20, a Saturday. According to GAO regulations, when the tenth day falls on a weekend or holiday, the deadline is extended to the next business day.

In this case, that would be Monday, July 22.

Will they wait to the last moment, or will they file earlier? If it was me, I’d make the other guys sweat and file at the last possible moment. Then again, if I felt I had an especially strong case, I might want to file as soon as possible.

NGEN is a services contract that the Navy and Marine Corps will use to manage IT infrastructure network, which includes 400,000 seats and 800,000 users around the globe.

HP’s team includes AT&T, IBM, Lockheed Martin, and Northrop Grumman. They were squared off against a team led by Harris and Computer Sciences Corp., whose team also included General Dynamics, Cisco and Verizon.

For an analysis of the team, click here.

A couple interesting things about the contract is that it was evaluated on a lowest price, technically acceptable criteria. The Navy said that, when the request for proposals was released last year, they didn’t expect anything custom to be built for NGEN, and that everything they were asking for was commercially available from multiple sources.

The contract also has a one-year base and four one-year options, half the time frame of the original NMCI contract.

NMCI was awarded to EDS in 2000, and has been extended several times via a continuity of services contract. The early years nearly bankrupted EDS, and weakened the company to the point that it became a takeover target for HP.

Eventually though, NMCI was turned around, and even became a referenceable account for HP. The contract brought in $1 billion year for the company.

The pricing for NGEN is lower, at $3.5 billion over five years, rather than the expected $5 billion. The Navy said it will save $1 billion over the life of the contract, compared to its current costs.

With those kinds of numbers in play, Harris and CSC are obviously giving a protest serious thought. You can’t blame them; this piece of business is just too critical.

A protest should be expected, but whether they prevail is another question. The Navy expressed confidence that they could withstand a protest, and it does seem they have been extremely methodical in their processes.

Right now, we sit and wait, so mark your calendar and count down the days with me.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Jul 12, 2013 at 11:48 AM


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!