WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Lockheed expects delays to drive sequestration cuts

The quarterly reports for many defense and IT contractors will be coming out over the next couple of weeks, and we’re sure to get some more insights into the market and to the impact of sequestration.

One of the interesting things about quarterly reports is that they simultaneously give you a look back and a look forward.

First out of the gate is Lockheed Martin. Northrop Grumman, L-3 Communications and General Dynamics follow later this week. Others will be coming later this month.

Some highlights from Lockheed:

  • Sales for the quarter dropped $200 million, falling to $11.1 billion from $11.3 billion.
  • Sequestrations impact has been limited so far.
  • Revenue for the Information Systems and Global Solutions is up slightly to $2.1 billion, compared to $2.09 billion for the quarter a year ago.

The engine behind IS&GS's positive results was work under the Defense Information Systems Agency's GIG services management and operations contract, as well as the National Science Foundation's Antarctic Support contract.

But there were lower sales in other areas, particularly the Next Generation Identification and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Consolidated IT Infrastructure Contract, and the Outsourcing Desktop Initiative for NASA contract.

That’s the "looking backward" portion of the quarterly report. Looking ahead, things get murkier thanks to the S-word – sequestration.

The company, and I expect the other contractors to sing a similar tune, haven’t been told yet by customers what specific sequestration decisions have been made, except in very limited circumstances.

In light of that, the company is using high level estimates of the impact. It expects a reduction in revenue in 2013 of $825 million. The company now thinks revenue to be on the low end of its $44.5 billion to $46 billion outlook.

The company makes an interesting assumption about sequestration, most likely based on conversations with customers.

Sequestration cuts will be achieved through delays and deferment of new program starts instead of modifying or restructuring contracts. Existing contracts have obligated schedules and delivery requirements. Makes sense to me. If the government cancels or restructures contracts, it could cost them more money than it saves. (My words, not Lockheed’s.).

“While the impact of sequestration on our business has been limited to date, we continue to work closely with our customers to better understand the future impact sequestration may have on our programs,” CEO Marillyn Hewson said in a statement.

Indeed, I expect that’s going to be a common refrain among executives for the next six months.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Apr 23, 2013 at 7:24 PM


Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!