WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Amazon-CIA deal triggers plenty of questions

When it comes to traffic on our website, few stories are as hot as the CIA-Amazon $600 million cloud deal.

For our sister publication, FCW, who broke the story, the traffic probably ranks the story as one of their biggest ever.

Large, mainstream business news outlets, such as Forbes.com and Marketwatch.com, have picked up the story, which drove a tremendous number of readers to FCW’s site. A Google News search on Amazon and CIA reveals a broad range of blogs and news sites reporting on FCW’s reporting.

Unfortunately, no one is really breaking anything that FCW’s Frank Konkel hasn’t already had in his story.

At the FCW Fed100 gala earlier this week, I asked several people about the deal, and what they had heard. Lots of people had heard that it happened, though few knew many details.

The idea of Amazon building a private cloud for the CIA has captured people’s imaginations, but shouldn’t be that surprising. The CIA has always been cutting edge when it comes to technology and innovation.

In 1999, it created its own venture capital group, In-Q-Tel, to invest in emerging technologies that can support intelligence operations.

Look at some recent investments, and a move to the cloud shouldn’t be too surprising:

  • Delphix, data management and virtualization solutions
  • Tyfone, mobile security in the cloud
  • Cloudant, big data analytics in the cloud.
  • Huddle, secure cloud-based collaboration
  • Adaptive Computing, developer of a cloud computing operating system

And that goes back just to August. Obviously, the CIA sees great value in cloud computing for the entire intelligence community in areas such as collaboration, analytics and mobile.

If you think about the vast amounts of data the CIA and the rest of the intell community has, a cloud approach is probably the only solution that brings any hope of discovering and using the intelligence and knowledge locked away in that data.

For Amazon, this is simply a great deal to make because it is high dollar and long term.

But people have plenty of questions, one of which is, what exactly does it mean that they are going to “build” a private cloud?

Are they going to literally and figuratively wall off part of GovCloud? Or, are they going to break ground some other place?

Is this government-owned/government-operated cloud or contractor-owned/contractor operated? Or some kind of hybrid?

Who are Amazon’s partners? The long list of partners on the government section of the AWS site doesn’t reveal a lot of household names.

One person speculated to me that this might be the start of Amazon’s play to become more like IBM by providing upfront consulting through build out, and then maintenance and operations. It’s a 10-year deal, though I’m sure at least half is in options, but obviously the CIA and Amazon see this as a relationship.

The tough part for Amazon is that this contract will never be a referenceable account in the traditional sense. We’ll likely never see a case study about how the CIA is using the cloud on the Amazon Web Service site.

I’m sure Teresa Carlson, who leads the global public sector business for AWS, is just bursting to talk about it, but she’ll likely never get the chance.

On the other hand, the win adds a little bad-ass swagger to Amazon. It’s easy to imagine the clichéd dialogue:

Carlson: We won a contract, but if I tell you, I’d have to kill you.

I’m sure she’d say it with that great Kentucky accent as well.

So other than stating the obvious that this is a big deal, figuring out what it means and how much of a shift this is in the market will take more time. But we’ll keep asking those questions.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Mar 22, 2013 at 7:24 PM


Reader Comments

Wed, May 8, 2013 zafarrano Santa Fe

Ah, Washington, you do the very thing you say you like least when you predict my censure by others. As for those who will no longer listen, place me on your own list, for your argumentative nature exceeds my desire to further communicate with you.

Tue, Mar 26, 2013

Seriously? Nobody cares about freedom or privacy?

Mon, Mar 25, 2013 Washington

To Zafarrano Wolffe--You said Nick should "celebrate our differences." That's exactingly what he was doing. In this case, he was celebrating Carlson's great Kentucky accent. Don't manufacture offense when none exists; otherwise, no one will listen you when you actually have a legitimate complaint.

Mon, Mar 25, 2013

The secrecy means that if it is hacked, the CIA and Amazon will never tell and we will never know how well it works if it does at all.

Mon, Mar 25, 2013 ZAFARRANO WOLFFE SANTA FE

Question: Why was it necessary to reference her accent. I, too, have an accent, as do 90% of Americans, inlcuding you, should you be visiting Kentucky. In the future, I suggest you celebrate (and not underscore) our differences.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts