WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Another delay for $5B Navy NGEN

It’s tempting to be a little snarky about the Navy’s announcement that it is pushing back the award date of the Next Generation Enterprise Network contract from February to May.

“Due to the complexities of the NGEN requirements, we are changing our contract award estimate in order to ensure a complete and thorough review of offerors’ bids,” said Ed Austin, spokesman for the Navy Program Executive Office for Enterprise Information Systems, in a statement.

NGEN is a five-year, $5 billion contract that will replace the Navy-Marine Corps Intranet contract, first won by EDS in 2000. NMCI was supposed to expire in 2010, but continues on through a continuity of operations contract.

At one time, it nearly destroyed EDS, and helped weaken the company to the point that Hewlett-Packard Co. could acquire EDS. Today, the contract is an important and lucrative one. The original NMCI contract brought in $9.3 billion to HP, and the continuity contract is worth another $3.4 billion through July 2015.
 
No word on whether this latest delay will add more dollars to that total.

HP is leading one team in the bidding for the contract, and Computer Sciences Corp. and Harris are leading a second team.

The delay shouldn’t be a surprise, given that the Navy had to extend NMCI by five years (through 2015). They have some wiggle room and NGEN is complex; after all, there are 800,000 users.

But the Navy also has been clear that this is a low-price, technically acceptable competition, which you would think would make the evaluation easier.

In May, Capt. Shawn Hendricks, program manager for the Naval Enterprise Networks program office, said all of the services under NGEN are commercially available and can be provided by multiple companies. “We saw no place where the government would be willing to pay a premium,” he said.

My uneducated guess is that the Navy is taking the extra time in an effort to make the best decision. What little time I’ve spent with Hendricks leaves me with little doubt about how seriously he takes this competition. He teared up at the May briefing when talking about the team who wrote the request for proposals.

I hope they are also trying to protest-proof their decision, and putting significant effort into how they will explain to the loser why they lost.

So, for today, I’ll save my snarkiness and hope that the Navy will make wise use the extra three months.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Jan 31, 2013 at 7:24 PM


Reader Comments

Tue, Apr 9, 2013

The first NMCI contract had multiple companies. It did NOT work. What make Capt. Hendricks think same idea will work for NGEN?

Tue, Mar 19, 2013 John Arlington

When is the Department of Defense going to realize that IT infrastructure is a utility. The arduous competitive process was driven by adherence to the rules surrounding acquisition of major weapons systems. An internet makes sense but it needs to be responsive and not driven by archaic acquisiton rules and regs that lose sight of the end users needs!

Thu, Feb 28, 2013

Let the commands have control again. Nothing more frustrating then to wait two weeks for a "tech" to come out a replace a failed hard drive on an out to date computer.

Mon, Feb 4, 2013

Does the 800,000+ seats include the Marines? They're doing their own thing.

Mon, Feb 4, 2013 Bill

At $1B per year, you're talking $1,250 per user, or around $0.66 per user hour. I'm not seeing how that's a lot of money.

Show All Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!