Close this Advertisement




WT Business Beat

By Nick Wakeman

Blog archive
Nick Wakeman

Is the Air Force flying with egg on its face?

When the news broke about the Air Force suspending three contractors, we went right to the service and got the documents that laid out allegations and reasoning behind the action.

It was damning stuff. If true, the three contractors, Advanced C4 Solutions Inc., the prime, and its subcontractors Iron Bow Technologies and Superior Communications Solutions Inc., deserved to have the book thrown at them.

They were working on a project on two buildings at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland.

The Air Force said it was considering pursuing debarment actions against the three, which in effect would put them out of the government contracting business.

The report had details including the number of trouble tickets issued against their work and the number of critical findings and major and minor findings uncovered by a third-party review of the work.

The Air Force said the contractors left without finishing and wouldn’t turn over documentation the problems they allegedly left behind could be fixed.

Today it is a different tune. The Air Force has lifted the suspensions without requiring any corrective actions by the companies.

Advanced C4 Solutions released a statement that says the companies were caught up in the Air Force’s efforts to catch bad actors. “The government sometimes casts a wide net and snares some good guys,” an AC4S executive said.

My mind keeps going back to all those details in the Air Force report. Where did they come from? What do they mean now? Did an overreaching prosecutor push through the suspensions?

While once eager to share information about the case, the Air Force is now in stealth mode. We’re just getting a steady flight of no comments.

Is the service so embarrassed by its apparent mistake that it just doesn’t want to talk about it?

The Air Force really shouldn’t have it both ways. If it talked in the beginning, it should talk now. It is probably the best way to restore the damage done to these three companies.

Posted by Nick Wakeman on Nov 30, 2011 at 7:25 PM


Share

Reader Comments

Thu, Dec 1, 2011 Andrew S Maryland

Look for the connection between the "independent" third-party review of the work and an Air Force big wig at Andrews.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above
SEARCH

Trending

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Surviving Lowest Price Technically Acceptable IT Projects: Maximize your Returns and Customer Satisfaction Ratings

    Register for this FREE exclusive roundtable webcast to hear from Nick Wakeman, Editor of Washington Technology, Shamun Mahmud, Cloud Security Architect, DLT Solutions and Paul McCloskey, Federal Alliances Leader, SolarWinds, and they discuss the different approaches on how you can deliver low cost, technically excellent, better value solutions to meet the fiscal and technology needs of today’s government, while still maximizing your returns on your LPTA IT projects. Learn More!