Tom O

OPINION

How to target NASA $2B opportunity

NASA offers among the best opportunities for technology sales in the federal marketplace at the moment, with a considerable budget for technology. Navigating that organization, however, can be a challenge worthy of a rocket scientist.

NASA’s fiscal 2014 IT budget was around $1.44 billion, a figure fairly similar to their 2013 levels of $1.43 billion. That seems to be a solid chunk of change – but it doesn’t tell the whole NASA story.

This is a historically federated IT organization – its IT purchasing is conducted at multiple levels, with components often acting independently of each other. The bulk of the agency’s work takes place in NASA centers. The bulk of NASA’s IT funding, however, resides in its mission directorates. According to a report from the Office of the Inspector General, mission directorates control 62 percent of the IT budget, and the centers control 27 percent.

In fact, not only do mission directorates control a substantial portion of the existing IT budget, they have significant control over the entire NASA budget. Mission directorates are likely account for an additional $800 million or so in IT spending.

That means the actual IT spend by NASA is closer to $2.2 billion, with the difference embedded at the program level, as opposed to the typical IT budget (the better to keep it out of the hands of people determined to cut it).

What does this mean? Ultimately, don’t assume the center CIO controls the bulk of the IT spending at a NASA center – that spending could actually be in the hands of the mission directorates. A center CIO may not have the money for your technology solutions, but a mission directorate in the center may.

Governance and oversight issues

When you do the math related to the budget breakout above, NASA CIO Larry Sweet and his headquarter leadership team actually control only about 11 percent of NASA’s overall IT budget. That has led to concerns about IT governance at NASA, and the HQ CIO’s limited control over the IT budget.

In particular, governance issues center on enterprise-wide IT contracts collectively known as I3P (IT Infrastructure Integration Program), designed in part to enable the HQ CIO to have increased oversight of the NASA IT budget.

The shortcoming of the I3P contracts is that the enterprise approach that the HQ CIO aimed for doesn’t work in an IT culture that has historically been federated.

IT purchasing is still often conducted at the center-level, and based on interpersonal relationships developed over the years. The decrease in relationship purchasing in these new, enterprise-wide I3P contracts has caused inefficiencies, impeding cost-savings.

Additionally, it’s difficult to track the IT spending at the centers and report that data up to NASA HQ.

Sales rules of thumb

Most technology vendors have considerable opportunity to sell across the NASA enterprise. Depending on the technology, however, it may be easiest for account planning purposes to focus on certain directorates or centers first.

Here are some rules of thumb for selling into NASA:

  • HQ and the center CIO leadership are looking for enterprise tracking and reporting tools.
  • Mission directorates are looking for mission-enablement tools like design and project management.
  • NASA centers will look for back-office applications and other user support tools, as well as updating and upgrading NASA’s networks.

Because the HQ CIO is interested in greater transparency into how component level budgets are being allocated, it’s possible that we will see increased HQ CIO-level mandates encouraging stronger reporting of IT spend. (In fact, expect exactly this if scrutiny continues to show negative results for the major I3P contracts.)

It’s worth reiterating that NASA’s printed IT budget of some $1.4 billion is understated to the tune of $800 million more IT spending at the mission level, where it’s out of sight of factions that might want to cut it.

Technology vendors have opportunity throughout NASA, as long as they do the necessary hunting to find the right office at the right time. The biggest customer may not be a Center CIO procurement officer – it might be the engineer next door.

Selling IT to NASA it isn’t rocket science – except when it is.

About the Author

Tom O’Keefe is market intelligence senior analyst for immixGroup. He can be reached at Tomas_Okeefe@immixgroup.com.

Reader Comments

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
 Top 100 Slideshow
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts