Navy pushes back $5B NGEN bids

The Navy has given an extension to contractors bidding on the $5.4 billion Next Generation Enterprise Network project.

Bids were due July 18, but the Navy has moved the deadline back until Aug. 8 because of several amendments to the solicitation and severe weather in the Washington D.C. area that caused power outages, according to a FedBizOpps.gov posting


More on the Navy's NGEN strategy


The Navy is using NGEN to replace the Navy Marine Corps Intranet as the IT support contract for 800,000. The service s spends about $1 billion a year through the NMCI contract, held by Hewlett-Packard Co.

HP Enterprise Services is leading one of two teams chasing NGEN. The second team is led by Harris Corp. and Computer Sciences Corp. So far they are the only announced bidders on the contract.

The extension of the due date for proposals apparently doesn’t impact the current timeline of an award by February 2013.

NMCI has been in place since 2000, when it was won by EDS Corp., which HP later acquired. NGEN, however, will be a five-year contract, with a one-year base and four one year options.

NGEN also is being evaluated as a low price/technically acceptable proposal. The Navy has said they see no services in the contract that they would be willing to pay a premium for.

About the Author

Nick Wakeman is the editor-in-chief of Washington Technology. Follow him on Twitter: @nick_wakeman.

Reader Comments

Wed, Jul 25, 2012

"low price/technically acceptable", then the real Navy starts to live with it and it no longer is "Technically Acceptable", so here come the change orders. Will this contract follow NMCI Management, when the Contractor had a problem during their first few years, they didn't hire a technical specialist to fix the problem, they hired another Retired Admiral to play golf with their Active Duty Buddies!

Tue, Jul 24, 2012 DoD Reformer Washington DC

Here is more evidence that Navy has no clue on how to manage IT programs. The cost overruns, sole source extensions, bloated program office (with over 200 consultants) has cost the tax payer billions in avoidable waste. All the while, the DON CIO issues more and more unless policy that only increases paperwork and now focusing on auditing any IT project over $500k. I can understand why the USMC has chosen to go their own way. Unfortunately, no one in the Navy chain of command is willing or able to hold its IT leadership accountable for outcomes. Navy IT is broker, and those who have moved up into higher positions at DOD CIO and DCMO are to blame for creating a culture of incompetence.

Please post your comments here. Comments are moderated, so they may not appear immediately after submitting. We will not post comments that we consider abusive or off-topic.

Please type the letters/numbers you see above

What is your e-mail address?

My e-mail address is:

Do you have a password?

Forgot your password? Click here
close
SEARCH
contracts DB

Trending

  • Dive into our Contract Award database

    In an exclusive for WT Insider members, we are collecting all of the contract awards we cover into a database that you can sort by contractor, agency, value and other parameters. You can also download it into a spreadsheet. Read More

  • Is SBA MIA on contractor fraud? Nick Wakeman

    Editor Nick Wakeman explores the puzzle of why SBA has been so silent on the latest contractor fraud scandal when it has been so quick to act in other cases. Read More

Webcasts

  • How Do You Support the Project Lifecycle?

    How do best-in-class project-based companies create and actively mature successful organizations? They find the right mix of people, processes and tools that enable them to effectively manage the project lifecycle. REGISTER for this webinar to hear how properly managing the cycle of capture, bid, accounting, execution, IPM and analysis will allow you to better manage your programs to stay on scope, schedule and budget. Learn More!

  • Sequestration, LPTA and the Top 100

    Join Washington Technology’s Editor-in-Chief Nick Wakeman as he analyzes the annual Top 100 list and reveals critical insights into how market trends have impacted its composition. You'll learn what movements of individual companies means and how the market overall is being impacted by the current budget environment, how the Top 100 rankings reflect the major trends in the market today and how the biggest companies in the market are adapting to today’s competitive environment. Learn More!